Talk:Bloody Code

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hello, I am a college student in the class History of English Culture in Ca'Foscari University. As a midterm project, I would be working on improving this page! Any comments or help will be much welcomed. :) Eslee110 (talk) 09:38, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm doing GCSE history and I thought this was useful information. I don't know that much about it but it's a start. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.213.252.242 (talk • contribs) 18:52 (UTC), 20 April 2005

Thanks, useful history info. Nasty stuff though! --J. Atkins (talk | contribs) 19:36, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a really inaccurate and incomplete argument. It does not take into account the fact that most people were not put to death for these crimes due to extensive use of pardons. The sporadic use of the death penalty was designed to scare people into behaving but it wasn't as harsh as this article suggests. The fact that the only reference used is the extremely biased Amnesty probably accounts for this. Xlittlemissparanoidx 08:49, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of Sources

Why is this article almost entirely devoid of sources? It makes me suspicious that this is all a copy and paste job or is just someone typing what they vaguely remember from a history class. Are there not sources on this topic?Jdlund (talk) 13:51, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sections

I've divided the article into sections and removed the tag. Feel free to change it. ArdClose (talk) 18:16, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Original research?

I reverted this:

The reason for the rise in the amount of capital offences in the late 17th century, the 18th century and the early 19th century is that the wealthy law makers were extremely worried about crime towards their property and wealth. The rich during this time were getting richer and thus they had more to lose from crime against their property, so the obvious solution for them was to make offences against property punishable by death. One could be hanged at Tyburn for stealing something as little as lace! The Lawmakers thought that by making crime against property punishable by death, people who would steal or damage property would be deterred from offending, so the wealthy people's possesions would be protected, or so was thought.

Interesting if true, but it needs a source. I didn't 'citation needed' it because it's so large. If anybody can source this, it's a valid contribution!142.103.225.18 (talk) 23:10, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Term

It become known as the bloody code retrospectively, so when and by which historians originally? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.53.69.150 (talk) 13:50, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Benefit of Clergy?

The Blackstone quote which mentions the phrase is not understandable to me, even after looking up the mean of "Benefit of Clergy" -- what is meant by "instant death"? Is this to be taken literally or does it also have a legal meaning here?--Jrm2007 (talk) 05:50, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bloody Code. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930223055/http://www.amnesty.org.uk/content.asp?CategoryID=10403 to http://www.amnesty.org.uk/content.asp?CategoryID=10403

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:34, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]