Talk:Eryngium
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
I added a "larger version" link to the bigger picture and continued to use the thumbnail, because it looks significantly sharper (esp. in the flower center) than the auto-generated thumb. Stan 07:07, 4 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Wrong Subfamily?
[edit]National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) places the genera Eryngium and Sanicula in the tribe Saniculeae in the the subfamily Saniculoideae. Germplasm Resource Information Network (GRIN) places the genera within the same tribe Saniculeae but in the subfamily Apioideae. ITIS does not recognize either the subfamily or the tribe. The APG IV system on the Angiosperm Phylogeny Website by the Missouri Botanical Garden (MOBOT) also places the two genera in the Saniculoideae. At least two recent molecular DNA studies of the subfamily Saniculeae maintain the placement of both genera within the subfamily Saniculoideae. No discussion of moving the genera could be found. If the placement in the subfamily Apioideae is an error, that error is repeated by Wikipedia on both Eryngium and Sanicula pages. Johnvalo (talk) 15:13, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Botanist help needed - are these really synonyms for same species
[edit]Eryngium agavifolium Griseb. - agave-leaved sea holly Eryngium aquaticum - rattlesnake master Eryngium yuccifolium - rattlesnake master, button snakeroot Jemoulton (talk) 01:54, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Sea-hollies seem mostly prickly - needs byword on whom it's prickles ward against...
[edit]...guess the sea-holly's unbidden guests would be slugs and snails and suchlike. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:411:1600:A956:103:F8BF:42CB (talk) 01:31, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
"usually spiny leaves" or usually thorns? or prickles?
[edit]There is a noteworthy sundriness to the aforesaid. Most 'hollykind' are known for their prickles rather than spines. Reckon it should instead read "usually prickly leaves". . . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:411:1600:A956:103:F8BF:42CB (talk) 01:37, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Eryngium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131102095030/http://benthamscience.com/open/topharmcj/articles/V003/99TOPHARMCJ.pdf to http://benthamscience.com/open/topharmcj/articles/V003/99TOPHARMCJ.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:59, 6 December 2017 (UTC)