User talk:SzczecinCity

Szczecin City Project

Hi,

Yours list of districts in Szczecin in wrong (apparently historic one). The current official list is here: http://www.szczecin.pl/rada/rady/adres.htm. Also, you should not blank the Dabie article, you should instead move it back to Szczecin-Dabie. Finally, there is not such think as Szczecin-Dąbie district. There is Szczecin-Dąbie railway station, but Dąbie district, as can be seen in every city plan. I for one live in Pomorzany district, not in Szczecin-Pomorzany. I shall revert your changes now. Przepla 15:47, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Better name would be Dabie, neighbourhood in Szczecin or similar. Moreover in Nowa Encyklopedia Popularna PWN Dąbie article is about Dąbie in Szczecin. Therefore I selected Dąbie, to be the main one. Not the one near Koło. Sorry, for being rude earlier. I'll take care of Szczecin-Dabie article later today. I'll move it, since simple copy and paste break history (and attributions). Przepla 16:20, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Yet another thought. You seems to have many historical data about Szczecin. I am happy for yours contributions, but maybe we could split for me writing about current situation, and you about history? Przepla 16:23, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)

unverified image

Thanks for uploading Image:Szczecin Neigborhoods.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much, Duk 08:21, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Szczcin Airport

Could you please have a look at the coments at Talk:Szczecin-Lotnisko. I thinkk it either needs to be merged with Szczecin Airport or the two articles need to be disambiguated. Thanks -- Adz|talk 05:54, 26 July 2006 (UTC) [reply]

(I got confused - see discussion at Talk:Airports in Poland with unpaved runways -- Adz|talk 07:47, 26 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Dabie,_Kolo_County.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dabie,_Kolo_County.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:50, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Skoki, Szczecin

The article Skoki, Szczecin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this place exists. It has no Polish Wikipedia article, no references. I searched on Google and couldn't find any reference to it at all.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HappyWith (talk) 17:54, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Skoki, Szczecin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Skoki, Szczecin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skoki, Szczecin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

HappyWith (talk) 03:29, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]