Jump to content

User talk:Warofdreams

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archives

Town halls

[edit]

Hi - Many thanks for your work on town halls. I think that Holmfirth Civic Hall is a great find and probably should have been drafted early. I am a bit more concerned about Stocksbridge Town Hall which looks as if it needs quite a lot of work to demonstrate significant coverage per WP:GNG. I will take a look tomorrow and see what I can do. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 23:18, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks also for your work adding details and generally improving the articles which I've created. I agree that the current sources on Stocksbridge Town Hall are poor. I've rather optimistically written the article because apparently there's a proper history of the building in History of Stocksbridge by Jack Branton, but I don't have access to that book. Warofdreams talk 23:32, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As you will have seen I have expanded Stocksbridge Town Hall and added a bit of historical background to the article on Castleford Civic Centre. The Castleford one already had good coverage so that was pretty easy. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 18:01, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Dormskirk that's some great work, thank you. I'll most likely be adding a few more articles on town halls soon and would welcome your contributions to them, should you have the time. Warofdreams talk 23:47, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's fine. Many thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 00:02, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi - I notice that you have included Skegness Town Hall in the List of city and town halls in England. There are now 670 town halls in the list and for all the other 669 we have images (and the same for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland). I have previously used the availability of an image as a key criteria for selection and in a number of cases I visited the town hall first before writing the article. Skegness is a bit out of my way and, as you have recently added a few town halls in the Lincolnshire area, I wondered if it was near you? Is there any chance you could take a photo before we include it? Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 00:57, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dormskirk Sadly I won't be in Skegness any time soon. Perhaps someone from WikiProject Lincolnshire might be able to take a photo? As it's a large and listed building, it's surprising there is no photo on Commons or Geograph, and the only ones on Flickr are under non free licences. I've got no objection if you want to remove it from the list until there's an accompanying photo. Warofdreams talk 02:19, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi - Many thanks for that. I have as you suggested opened a section on WikiProject Lincolnshire in the hope that someone responds. In the meantime, I have uploaded a (rather poor quality) image originating from Geograph, pending uploading of something better. I will take a look at the article itself later today. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 09:53, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

London meetup bicententary

[edit]

FYI, the 200th London Meetup is happening tomorrow, Sunday 14 January. You may be interested as you were present at the very first one (pictured)! Note that it is now at Penderel's Oak on High Holborn by the Great Turnstile. Andrew🐉(talk) 14:10, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I won't be in London tomorrow, but I hope you have a great meetup! Warofdreams talk 23:18, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Allerton Castle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gothick.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red February 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298


Online events:

Announcement

  • Please let other wikiprojects know about our February Black women event.

Tip of the month:

  • AllAfrica can now be searched on the ProQuest tab at the WP Library.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:11, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Nomination of Spartacist League (Sweden) for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spartacist League (Sweden) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spartacist League (Sweden) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AlexandraAVX (talk) 22:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"San-Pédro" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect San-Pédro has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 6 § San-Pédro until a consensus is reached. CycloneYoris talk! 21:13, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Listed buildings in Barden

[edit]

I cannot find any listed buildings in Barden, Craven - just two scheduled monuments. Are you aware of any? Peter I. Vardy (talk) 16:07, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Peter I. Vardy the official website seems to be struggling with the abolition of the North Yorkshire districts and so is only showing the listed monuments, but there are a fair few buildings. Here's a list which may it may not be completely up to date. Warofdreams talk 16:15, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks. For some reason, that did not come up on my search on British Listed Buildings or the NHLE. Will do it next. Cheers. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 18:04, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kensington North (London County Council constituency)

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kensington North (London County Council constituency), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:21, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Emerald City Roller Girls.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Emerald City Roller Girls.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:21, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red March 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301


Online events:

Announcements

Tip of the month:

  • When creating a new article, check various spellings, including birth name, married names
    and pseudonyms, to be sure an article doesn't already exist.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:24, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lava City Roller Dolls.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lava City Roller Dolls.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revolutionary Communist Party (UK, 1944)

[edit]

Unfortunately, much of Revolutionary Communist Party (UK, 1944) has been deleted for being unsourced[1]. Would you be able to find sources for the material and restore it with citations (and/or ask other editors familiar with the topic to do so)? Wellington Bay (talk) 13:58, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wellington Bay that should be possible, I remember writing an early version drawing heavily on Bornstein and Richardson's War and the International. I don't think I have a copy any more, but I should be able to identify which passages come from it. Warofdreams talk 16:12, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks - there seems to be a pdf of the book available here[2]. I'll look too if I have a chance but the more editors working on this the better. Wellington Bay (talk) 19:09, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deanery of Middlesbrough

[edit]

Hello - I have seen your templates collecting the churches in the same Deanery together (wish I had thought of it myself). In your latest Deanery of Middlesbrough, you include a huge swathe of Wensleydale churches such as St Grgeory's in Bedale and Saint Patrick in Patrick Brompton. Have these changed recently as I was under the impression they were in the Deanery of Wensley (Diocese of Leeds), not the Diocese of York, to which the Deanery of Middlesbrough belongs? More than happy to be wrong. Thanks. The joy of all things (talk) 21:45, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! I think your links are wrong. The template for the Wensley Deanery states Middlesbrough in the title, and if you select any of the V-T-E links it takes you to the actual Middlesbrough one, not the Wensley one. Sorry. The joy of all things (talk) 21:48, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Glad you like the idea! That is exactly it, and the link and title should have been corrected, but I suspect you can see old versions on some of the articles. Warofdreams talk 21:49, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for doing the templates and sorting it all out. Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 21:57, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Borrowby, west North Yorkshire

[edit]

Hello. I have not been able to find a source for the listed buildings in this parish. Can you help, please? Cheers. Peter I. Vardy (talk) 08:47, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Peter I. Vardy I found one here. Warofdreams talk 09:23, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks - just what I wanted. Will do it in a day or two. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 11:07, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red April 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304


Online events:

Announcements

  • The second round of "One biography a week" begins in April as part of #1day1woman.

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:44, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:General Federation of Trade Unions logo.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:General Federation of Trade Unions logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Broughton Hall, North Yorkshire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conservatory.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red May 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | May 2024, Volume 10, Issue 5, Numbers 293, 294, 305, 306, 307


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Use open-access references wherever possible, but a paywalled reliable source
    is better than none, particularly for biographies of living people.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 06:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Congrats

[edit]

I just noticed this diff and wanted to say thanks for your service over the years. I remember seeing your User page when the wiki-world was young and wondering what it was you meant by "there must be a better term for that". Congrats on your 'retirement' and glad you are still around. Ben MacDui 10:35, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks, that's very kind. And you've reminded me I must update my user page! Warofdreams talk 20:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have just seen this. What a fantastic service to the wikipedia community! Dormskirk (talk) 11:48, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, that's lovely to hear. I've still got plenty of enthusiasm for creating and editing articles, and thank you for all your work on them. Warofdreams talk 20:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Editor experience invitation

[edit]

Hi, I'm Clovermoss. I'm 21 so it's pretty interesting to me that you've been a bureaucrat for pretty much my entire life, even if you are stepping down now. Anyways, I was hoping that maybe you'd be interested in being interviewed for this? Feel free to pass if you'd rather not. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 11:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

[edit]
You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Very impressed with your body of work and energy creating British buildings. Keep up the great work! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:19, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's very kind, many thanks! Warofdreams talk 22:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sort key - UK churches

[edit]

This has been discussed several times in the past. The last time I have found is December 2013 at Wikipedia talk:Categorization/Archive 15#Sort keys - churches. Do you know of a more recent discussion? Mhockey (talk) 22:53, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm not aware of a more recent discussion, but this is very common way to sort names of churches outside Wikipedia, and has been adopted for a majority of church articles in Wikipedia; while the 2013 discussion came to a different conclusion, it had low participation and hasn't been widely adopted. Perhaps a new discussion is in order? Warofdreams talk 23:05, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I agree that a new discussion would be good. I had understood that the 2011 discussion (which was broader than the brief discussion in 2013 which referred to the earlier discussion) was still the consensus, but it is clear that there is a lot of inconsistency which ought to be sorted out. As far as I can see, the inconsistency only relates to UK churches, which are sometimes sorted by parish, sometimes by location and sometimes by name or dedication.--Mhockey (talk) 20:54, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I overlooked a more recent discussion (2022) Wikipedia talk:Categorization/Archive 18#DEFAULTSORT for churches.--Mhockey (talk) 16:30, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, that was an interesting read and felt it was getting towards a consensus, it's a shame it petered out at the draft RfC stage. Warofdreams talk 21:23, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Norbury House

[edit]

An historic building? Really ? It appears to be a modern building of dubious merit standing where once an historic building stood. Or have I missed something significant? I am at a loss to understand where notability lies in the sources provided. Regards  Velella  Velella Talk   22:34, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I think this article is capable of improvement and am happy to try and do that. Dormskirk (talk) 22:42, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, it's just a start at present, but it has some notability as a hotel, and is also home to the town's theatre, as well as having housed the town's council, so I think there is potential. Warofdreams talk 22:57, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi - The article now has significant coverage so I have removed the notability tags. Note for Warofdreams: we may be reaching the end of the road for new articles on town halls (this one was only a municipal building for four years) so please feel free to give it a break unless some more important ones come up. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 08:48, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dormskirk thank you for your work on this article and the whole series. I've got two or three in mind which are listed and had longer histories as municipal buildings so I'll put those together, but otherwise I've been around the whole of England looking for notable town halls, so I agree it's about done. Warofdreams talk 13:26, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Great. I look forward to seeing the two or three you still have in mind. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 13:30, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red August 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | August 2024, Volume 10, Issue 8, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 313, 314, 315


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

  • TBD

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:59, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

CWI (2019)

[edit]

Please see Talk:Committee for a Workers' International (2019)#RFC: Copypasting from CWI 1974 and merging of two articles. Wellington Bay (talk) 12:23, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | September 2024, Volume 10, Issue 9, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 316, 317


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Rosiestep (talk) 19:04, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:International Federation of Actors logo.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:International Federation of Actors logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:56, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red October 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Unsure how to expand a stub article? Take a look at this guidance

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Block Request

[edit]

Hi! Hope you are having a nice day.

You came up as a recently active admin.

There's been an IP user (190.141.160.124) who has been repeatedly vandalising pages related to sharks (only 1 day after being unblocked). I think I've sent around 10 level 4 warnings and this point and they've been reported to WP:AIV by another user but they keep vandalising immediately after a revert.

I was wondering if you could take a look and potentially block them if you see fit, as it's becoming annoying to have to constantly revert all their unexplained blanking and factual errors.

Thanks! :)

Thanks for your message, but I'm about to log off, with the request up on AIV you should get a response soon. Warofdreams talk 23:07, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

[edit]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Proposed deletion of Spartacist League of Britain

[edit]
Notice

The article Spartacist League of Britain has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Extremely minor left-wing group, no notability established. Attempts to find RS come up blank, article is nearly 100% WP:SELFPUB violation. No likelihood of improvement. Delete.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rambling Rambler (talk) 11:29, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Workers' Fight

[edit]
Notice

The article Workers' Fight has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Extremely minor left-wing group, no notability established. Attempts to find RS come up blank, article is nearly 100% WP:SELFPUB violation. No likelihood of improvement. Delete.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rambling Rambler (talk) 11:31, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Workers' Power (UK)

[edit]
Notice

The article Workers' Power (UK) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Extremely minor left-wing group, no notability established. Attempts to find RS come up blank, article is nearly 100% WP:SELFPUB violations. Only RS present are in reality about journalist Paul Mason, and notability is not inherited.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rambling Rambler (talk) 11:52, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red November 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:46, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Proposed deletion of Workers League (Ireland)

[edit]
Notice

The article Workers League (Ireland) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can't find additional sources for this organisation. I don't believe it could pass WP:ORG even with a few additional sources, nevermind the state it's currently in and has been since 2010. It's a micro-organisation that split from a micro-organisation. Despite the organisation having a famous member, Jack O'Connor, "Workers League Jack O'Conner" as a search term does not yield any sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Warofdreams&oldid=1254718694"