Fundamental Orders of Connecticut
 |
| Part of a series on the |
| Law of Connecticut
|
|---|
| WikiProject Connecticut |
The Fundamental Orders were adopted by the Connecticut Colony council on January 24 [O.S. January 14] 1639.[1] The fundamental orders describe the government set up by the Connecticut River towns, setting its structure and powers. They wanted the government to have access to the open ocean for trading.[2]
The Orders have the features of a written constitution and are considered by some authors to be the first written Constitution in the Western tradition. Thus, Connecticut earned its nickname of The Constitution State. The document is notable as it assigns supreme authority in the colony to the elected general court, omitting any reference to the authority of the British Crown or other external authority. In 1662, the colony petitioned the king for a royal charter, which substantially secured the colony's right to self-govern following the same form of government established by the Fundamental Orders.
History
[edit]In the year 1634, a group of Puritans and others who were dissatisfied with the rate of Anglican reforms sought to establish an ecclesiastical society subject to their own rules and regulations. The Massachusetts General Court granted them permission to settle the cities of Windsor, Wethersfield, and Hartford.[3] Ownership of the land was called into dispute by the English holders of the Warwick Patent of 1631. The Massachusetts General Court established the March Commission to mediate the dispute and named Roger Ludlow as its head. The Commission named eight magistrates from the Connecticut towns to implement a legal system. The March commission expired in March 1636, after which the settlers continued to self-govern.
On May 29, 1638, Ludlow wrote to Massachusetts Governor Winthrop that the colonists wanted to "unite ourselves to walk and lie peaceably and lovingly together." Ludlow and other principals drafted the Fundamental Orders, which were adopted on January 14, 1639 O.S. (January 24, 1639 N.S.) and established Connecticut as a self-ruled colony. Major John Mason was a magistrate and is credited with being one of the writers of this document.
There is no record of the debates or proceedings of the drafting or enactment of the Fundamental Orders. It is postulated that the framers wished to remain anonymous because England was watchful and suspicious of this vigorous infant colony; the commission from Massachusetts had expired.[4] The orders were transcribed into the official Connecticut Colony records by the colony's secretary Thomas Welles.[5]
"The men of the three towns were a law only to themselves. It is known that they were in earnest for the establishment of a government on broad lines; and it is certain that the ministers and captains, the magistrates and men of affairs, forceful in the settlements from the beginning, were the men who took the lead, guided the discussions, and found the root of the whole matter in the first written declaration of independence in these historical orders."[6]
Individual rights of the people
[edit] |
The Fundamental Orders of Connecticut is a short document but contains some principles that were later applied in creating the United States government. Government is based on the rights of an individual, and the orders spell out some of those rights, as well as how they are ensured by the government. It provides that all free men share in electing their magistrates, and uses secret, paper ballots. It states the powers of the government and some limits within which that power is exercised.
In one sense, the Fundamental Orders were replaced by a Royal Charter in 1662, however, the major outline of the charter was written in Connecticut and embodied the Orders' rights and mechanics. It was carried to England by Governor John Winthrop and basically[clarification needed] approved by the British King, Charles II. The colonists generally viewed the charter as a continuation and surety for their Fundamental Orders. Later on, the Charter Oak got its name when that charter was taken from Jeremy Adams's tavern and supposedly hidden in an oak tree, rather than it be surrendered to the agents of James II, who intended to annex Connecticut to the more centralized Dominion of New England.
Today, the individual rights in the Orders, with others added over the years, are still included as a "Declaration of Rights" in the first article of the current Connecticut Constitution, adopted in 1965.
Competing claims for the first Western constitution
[edit]Connecticut historian John Fiske was the first to claim that the Fundamental Orders were the first written Constitution, a claim disputed by some modern historians.[7] The Mayflower Compact has an equal claim 19 years before; however, this Order gave men more voting rights and made more men eligible to run for elected positions.[8] Karolina Adamová, a scientific member of the Institute of State and Law of the Czech Academy of Sciences argues that the articles of the Bohemian Confederacy adopted by the General Assembly of the evangelical estates in Prague on July 31, 1619, can be considered to be the first modern constitution and simultaneously the first federal constitution in recorded history.[9]
References
[edit]- ^ [http:/ hbhgjfuytfyuytfyuytfuyt/www.bartleby.com/65/fu/Fundamen.html "The Columbia Encyclopedia"] (Sixth ed.). ia University Press. 2005. Retrieved September 13, 2006.
{{cite web}}: Check|url=value (help) - ^ "The Fundamental Orders of Connecticut". Connecticut Humanities. January 14, 2023 – via ConnecticutHistory.org.
- ^ Horton, Wesley W. (June 30, 1993). The Connecticut State Constitution: A Reference Guide. Reference guides to the state constitutions of the United States. Vol. 17. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press. p. 2. ISBN 0-313-28565-9. OCLC 27066290. Retrieved September 17, 2008.
- ^ Taylor, John Metcalf (1900). Roger Ludlow, the Colonial Lawmaker. G.P. Putman's Sons. pp. 73–74.
It is the judgment of the most learned scholars, Dr. Charles J. Hoadley and the late Dr. J. Hammond Trumbull, that the men who were foremost in that great matter desired that no record of the transactions should be preserved; that they knew the Fundamental Orders would explain themselves-they needed no interpretation; that in letter and spirit they would find instant response and approval in the minds and hearts of the people; and it was so. It has been justly called a self-appointed constitution. But there were other reasons for the silence of the records. England was watchful and suspicious of this vigorous infant colony; the commission from Massachusetts had expired.
- ^ "The Fundamental Orders of Connecticut: Founding Document by a Founding Father". New England Historical Society. 2019. Retrieved November 2, 2019.
- ^ Taylor, John Metcalf (1900). Roger Ludlow, the Colonial Lawmaker. G.P. Putman's Sons. p. 74.
- ^ Secretary of the State of Connecticut (2007). "STATE OF CONNECTICUT Sites º Seals º Symbols". the Connecticut State Register and Manual. State of Connecticut. Archived from the original on September 26, 2012. Retrieved January 25, 2008.
- ^ Lutz, Donald S.; Schechter, Stephen L.; Bernstein, Richard B. (1991). Roots of the Republic: American founding documents interpreted. Madison, WI: Madison House. p. 24. ISBN 0-945612-19-2.
- ^ Adamová, Karolina (2009). První česká federativní ústava z roku 1619 (in Latvian). Praha Plzen: Ústav státu a práva AV ČR ve spolupráci s Vydavatelstvím a nakladatelstvím Aleš Čeněk. ISBN 978-80-904024-9-2. OCLC 437009481.[page needed]
External links
[edit]
