Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaka

Chaka was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE

This one is problematic on two levels: a) not notable, b) sounds like a load of rubbish, or even if true, hard to verify. Shane King 13:18, Oct 27, 2004 (UTC)

Delete. Fan-boasting by an editor whose English isn't so good. Fire Star 14:08, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC) (Is this an encyclopedia or an English test? Dickhead)
Abstain: It isn't the real name of the person, but just what he spray painted. I'm not sure if he passes the threshold of notability or not, but it's not clear. He's not Kilroy, but he's more than just a single incident. Sort of like Smokes in NYC, I gather, only less stable. If kept, send to clean up or look for a Los Angelino who knows. I could see it either way, though. Geogre 16:00, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Delete this junk and redirect to Chakra. It seems like a good misspelling redirect. -- [[User:Bobdoe|Bob Doe]] 16:58, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Replace with disambig for Chakra and Chaka Khan. Chris 02:59, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Cruft. --Improv 04:21, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Keep if verifiable and expand. —siro χ o 08:48, Oct 28, 2004 (UTC)
Redirect to Shaka. —AlanBarrett 18:06, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Wrong side of the line. Wile E. Heresiarch 04:26, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.