Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scottsdale Fashion Square

Scottsdale Fashion Square was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep

Non-notable shopping mall. RickK 23:56, Sep 21, 2004 (UTC)

• Delete, non-notable. • Benc • 23:46, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Yet another vote change to keep. Thanks for the expansion, Chuck. • Benc • 05:59, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Delete, unless they can tell us considerably more about this place. Ambi 23:53, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Much better now. Ambi 12:09, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Delete unless it's a really notable mall. Don't think so, especially since we don't even know what city it's in. Geogre 00:22, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep present revision by Chuckstar: the case for notability has been made. Geogre 04:24, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• I'm certain it's Scottsdale, Arizona. Camelback Road runs between Phoenix and Scottsdale, if memory serves. If it's the mall I'm thinking of, it's a nice place but it's still just a mall. Heck, Del Amo Fashion Square in Torrance, California is the second or third largest mall in the world and it doesn't have an article. Delete as non-notable, especially since the author couldn't be bothered to tell us where this place is. - Lucky 6.9 02:21, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Delete: nonnotable. Wile E. Heresiarch 03:40, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • I see the article has been expanded. Not sure now, no vote. Wile E. Heresiarch 05:12, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. The article contains no evidence of notability. Average Earthman 08:49, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• Keep - OK, the original article was completely useless. However, I just added some information as to why this is a notable mall. Additional interesting detail is available, I just don't have time to add it right now. Please check it out. From a real estate development viewpoint, this mall is actually pretty interesting. If we can have all of the fancruft that litters wikipedia, why not some interesting facts for the real estate professionals among us. BTW, the fact that Del Amo does not (yet) have an article is not necessarily a guideline for whether any other mall should or shouldn't have an article. A lot of encyclopedic topics do not (yet) have articles about them. (In fact, I'm thinking about writing a Del Amo article...) Chuck 21:01, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
• I almost hate to say it, but the history seems notable. Keep -- Jmabel 21:32, Sep 24, 2004 (UTC)
• Seems worthy to keep. --YUL89YYZ 19:44, Sep 27, 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.