Talk:Emgann

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Um, should this be in the "leftist terrorist organisations" category??

Hypno 20:39, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Don't think so, i'll remove it, iirc their "terrorist" wing maybe the ARB, but i'm pretty sure that Emgann themselves aren't terrorist. FrancisTyers 02:12, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Political bias in Breton articles

Reading through the various articles on the Breton independence movements, I note that there is quite an obvious bias in them. The French are more intolerant of self-determination in Brittany than the English in their neighbouring countries... and the articles on the various Scottish/Welsh/Cornish nationalists aren't merely written to set these people up as racists/terrorists or whatever. I think that I will stick POV notices on many of these articles --MacRusgail 12:28, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man, this article is mainly my doing. I'm kind of surprised by the POV notice as I'm very pro-self-determination etc, and yes the French are much less tolerant than say the English government. "French is the only language of the republic" etc. I suppose it’s because I translated a lot of the content of the article from the Emgann article on the French wikipedia (which is even more biased I have to say). Do you have any specific complaints about the article? I'd love some help :) - FrancisTyers 13:00, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise: In July, I did some work on tidying the Célestin Lainé article in which I relied heavily on the fr page. Since then, it is true, there have been a few changes in the fr version in changing wording from terrorist to activist for example, but given the nature of the subject, it seems that rather harsh terms would sometimes be inevitable. I know the story only from Wikipedia. If it is possible for someone to point to errors of fact or of balance between facts, doing so would be helpful to everyone but vaguely casting doubt seems less so. :-) (RJP 14:05, 21 September 2005 (UTC))[reply]

A lot of the bias is in the French article, and some of it is in some excessively literal translations from French. "Social-revolutionary" doesn't mean anything in English, and in French it just means leftist, noisy and anti-establishment. Leeme see if I can tighten up the translation. --Diderot 17:01, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Heh thanks, I'm not that great at French :) Although I would have said that social revolutionary has a meaning in English. I would say it basically means someone, or an organisation who is both socialist and revolutionary (i.e. rejecting the ballot box). I wasn't aware that in French it had a different meaning. Any help with the translation would be great thanks :) - FrancisTyers 18:18, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I tend to think of "Social revolutionary" as being one of the non-Bolshevik factions in the Russian Revolution, but it could well have a slightly different meaning in French as some of these similar terms do. --MacRusgail 15:39, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well aye, if it was being used as a noun it would mean Social Revolutionary, although looking at the WP article, it would seem that SR is actually 'Socialist Revolutionary' not 'Social Revolutionary' as I'd previously thought. :) - FrancisTyers 15:51, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Emgann logo.jpg

Image:Emgann logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:40, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shame!

No one has been found guilty for McDo's bombing in Quévert. The four men charged were cleared. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.12.235.125 (talk) 16:45, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]