Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiki addict
Maybe this should be deleted? I made the article myself...not the best way to cure. What do you think? Should we keep it and start our own clinic or should it be deleted? regards, --georingo 20:01, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- my vote: a strong keep ! --georingo 20:04, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete or move to your own User space. RickK 20:36, Oct 2, 2004 (UTC)
- Redirect to Wikipedia:Are You a Wikipediholic Test. — Gwalla | Talk 21:38, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, or at least move to Wikipedia namepace. Anything but keep. Wyllium 00:29, 2004 Oct 3 (UTC)
- Georingo, this article you've written is perfect for the Meta-wiki — why don't you copy it there before it's deleted here? The Meta-wiki is, among other things, a place to get all philosophical about the wiki phenomenon (see m:Category:Patterns). Who knows, there might be some possible cures there. :-)
Anyway, you were right to list Wiki addict for deletion; it's not an encyclopedia article. My vote is delete. • Benc • 08:08, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. --*drew 08:10, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- I agree with Gwalla and say Redirect to Wikipedia:Are You a Wikipediholic Test
- Move somewhat amusing content to georingo's user space and redirect the title to Wikipedia:Are You a Wikipediholic Test. Fire Star 20:26, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- No value in having even a redirect in the main space. A move to meta space or user space is fine by me. -- Jmabel 00:53, Oct 6, 2004 (UTC)
- Move to Wikipedia: namespace or m:Wiki addict. —No-One Jones (m) 00:55, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Does not belong in main namespace even as redirect. Move to meta or elsewhere. -- Cyrius|✎ 01:45, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: The best way to cure it is to write a policy proposal. Geogre 02:18, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)