Talk:Level of invention
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Can we have some examples of solutions that fit each of these levels, please? -- The Anome 14:39, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Level of invention. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050624134438/http://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/patents/what_innovation_review.shtml to http://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/patents/what_innovation_review.shtml
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050312021728/http://www.innovativecapacity.com/innovativecapacity.htm to http://www.innovativecapacity.com/innovativecapacity.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:03, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
This article probably needs to get deleted
[edit]Looks like it's basically a personal essay with a personal way to view invention. Zero real references and zero content referenced. North8000 (talk) 16:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- @North8000 The inventor of Triz, Genrikh Altshuller and the system of Triz is a solid and well utilised system.
- What is needed is some links to the original papers published by Genrikh Altshuller rather than what seems to be link farming for some other papers based on the original research and system.
- I disagree. It just needs better citations to the original author. 2404:4408:8739:B900:FC24:DD1:B501:2B6C (talk) 07:10, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
- The one thing that would resolve the issue is addition of suitable references. North8000 (talk) 16:39, 21 October 2022 (UTC)