Talk:Cruelty

Philosophy: Social and political Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Social and political philosophy

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Sociology

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Is this really suitable for wikipedia?

In my eyes, it's more of a wiktionary article. 217.60.43.5 06:28, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It is suitable, but could be developed into discussion of philosophical cruelty, re: Nietzsche, Artaud, etc.

Needs a proper definition. I believe that most people use the word cruel to imply the infliction of purposeful suffering. Being indiffrent to what someone else believes to be cruel to too subjective. Even though it is a subjective idea.86.41.103.12 (talk) 18:45, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

cruel

a cruel is also a mythival creature found in c.s.lewis's chronicles of nirnia. it is for the most part transparent, use a subsonic scream to attack it's enemies, and is a follower of the white witch.

Leuricy

Leuricy- antonym of cruelty definition= The utter absence of ill or hurtful intentions characterized by impartial love and/or hospitality. Usage: She became a saint because of the leuricy she showed towards others. Also can be an adjective (leuric). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cutlerowns19 (talk • contribs) 19:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"In consumer products" section

This reads like an add for Beauty without Cruelty. Its clearly cut and paste from a website, its not suitable at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ultan42 (talk • contribs) 23:03, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Eighth deadly sin?"

It might be tempting to conflate cruelty with anger, but anger usually emerges in abrupt, destructive actions that reflect transitory rage or a desire for personal revenge. Cruelty is often chilly in its execution and often reflects either indifference to suffering or active seeking of others' pain. Anger might be sated quickly and regretted, but cruelty is typically more permanent. An unwholesome political order like Nazi Germany can cultivate it as a unifying force of the culture.

Anger often gives a warning; cruelty typically operates under cover of a difference in power between the one who inflicts pain or ruin and the one who endures it.Pbrower2a (talk) 14:14, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Be mean" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Be mean. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 22#Be mean until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:59, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Hostile behavior" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Hostile behavior has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 19 § Hostile behavior until a consensus is reached. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 17:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Being mean" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Being mean has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 19 § Being mean until a consensus is reached. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 17:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]