Talk:Cannibals and Kings

Anthropology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

[Untitled]

Why is the Marvin Harris biography link on this page instead of on a Marvin Harris page? -- Zoe

Because there is no Marvin Harris page. I'm sure the link will be moved to Marvin Harris's page as soon as there is one. Hope this helps. -- Oliver P. 23:25 Mar 22, 2003 (UTC)

Not really. -- Zoe

Harris on state and some other points

I seem to remember that Harris discusses in a very interesting way the birth of the state institution in "Cannibals and Kings" (beginning with feasts the "big men"(?) gave and ending up with food storehouses guarded by the trusted men of kings, pharaohes and so on).

The discussion on sacred cows points out nicely how human rationality - or utility seeking - is relative, depending on cultural values or on how well people understand the complicated processes of nature and society.

The importance of cannibalism for the Aztec's, and the explanation Harris gives for its importance, seems to ignored by other anthropolgists. In my opinion it was convincing.

I remeber wondering why manure is not in the list of what pigs produce. At least cows were often kept mostly because they produced manure.

A very good book!

Cannibalism

The title of the book (which I haven't read) suggests that there is something in it about cannibalism. However, the present article says nothing at all about it. deisenbe (talk) 13:05, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]