Talk:Urology

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sections

I have amended the subspecialties slightly, adding references and info to Endourology with a link to the international sub-specialty's website. I have changed the Urologic Oncology Management description, the management mode of cancers correlates with doctor's training, unfortunately, and not the other way round (which would be more logical but is untrue). --Ariolan (talk) 22:08, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Paedophilia

I have removed a link at the bottom of the page to paedophilia with the words (pediatric urology) in parentheses, because the page on paedophilia made no reference to urology. If there is in fact more of a connection here beyond a few chuckles, it must be made more explicit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.135.226.217 (talk) 05:58, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Male-centric

"Branches of urology" goes on and on about prostates and penes and then at the end there's a paragraph on "gynecologic urology", as if women were a special case of men. While this may reflect the sad state of urology in practice[1], urology as a medical field is about all urogenital variants alike.--87.162.20.28 (talk) 19:57, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of Criticism Section

Do you think medical articles on WP should include information on to what extent the current practice is "Evidence-Based"? There is no critique in here on the effectiveness of the diagnostic and treatment methods of modern urology and whether or not urology is practiced strictly according to sound science.Herbxue (talk) 17:14, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Urology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150205173633/http://www.auanet.org/content/residency/what-is-urology.cfm to http://www.auanet.org/content/residency/what-is-urology.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:51, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]