emptied on August 16, 2005. See history for archive.

Quiet title action merged to Quiet title

Wanted to let you know. Cheers! BD2412 T 23:22, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WP:NH!

We'd make a template to welcome you, but whatever, we're still small enough to say hi in person. Please let me know if there's anything I can do to help you out or if you're looking for a project to sink your teeth (or I guess "fangs") into. karmafist 22:50, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Muncwatch

Maybe the instructions were hard to follow, that's my fault I guess since I assume you saw Millsfield, New Hampshire and assumed the same thing for Kilkenny, New Hampshire. When I put that edit there on muncwatch, there was no article there. Assawyer created the article a few days later[1], so I should have probably updated it, but I haven't since i've had so much to do(that was probably around 3,000 edits ago for me) lately. I haven't been able to keep up my pace because I may be taking a GIS class soon which will allow me to take on making the maps instead of just ignoring them for later like I am now. Should I make another column for the maps, seals and infoboxes? karmafist 02:56, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The creation of the Kilkenny and Millsfield articles were oversights on my part. I have merged both on both versions of the page. I think I will delete the newer version in keeping with policy. Assawyer 03:27, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No harm done, my friend. karmafist 07:50, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated

Actually, you might be way more useful helping out with this since you're a lawyer. It's way too big for one person, and i'm fairly inexperienced with them. karmafist 07:50, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what you want done. Of 23 states having a "law" category, under Category:State_law_in_the_United_States only Code of Virginia has anything remotely resembling a compendium, and that is only the list of titles in the Code! A few other states have a "code" or "law" article that comprises a law-stub having a link to the online code elsewhere. Many other places have lists of articles about important laws or decisions, such as Fundamental Laws of England. Are you aware of any other article regarding US state laws that actually includes the text, let alone the annotations? That would give us something to compare with. I, too, have little experience with NH law, being a MA lawyer. See General Laws of Massachusetts. Lupinelawyer 00:33, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Water Gas vs Wood Gas

Mr. L: In my article on Prof Lowe, you, in your avarice to redirect to other articles, blue lined the expression water-gas to an article on wood gas. Sir, these are two different items. Wood gas is more related to coal gas or coke gas. Water gas was a process to develop pure hydrogen, and its process is far different than obtaining coke gas from wood. Possibly we need an article on water-gas itself. Magi Media 04:16, 15 February 2006 (UTC)Magi MediaMagi Media 04:16, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you note there was no such separate article when I wikified the technical term, only a redirect from water gas (see oldid=31428511), you will see that the wood gas article equates the two, accurately or not. It was admittedly expedient to bypass the redirect article and I offer my effusive and heartfelt apologies for offending your sensibilities. As you have now created a separate water gas article, perhaps you would relish the opportunity to correct the link you impetuously deleted from Lowe's article, and make the necessary corrections in wood gas and review all of its incoming linkages for similar inaccuracies. "Avarice"? Sheesh. I don't get paid for this! ;-) Lupinelawyer 16:10, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Patent application/Patent prosecution articles

Hi. It seems to me that there is a bit of mess of patent law articles at the moment, with significant overlap between them. I'm having a go at improving things, and have started with the Patent application and Patent prosecution articles. I have created a (very) rough outline of what I think should be in each of the articles at Patent application/temp and Patent prosecution/temp articles, based upon the exising articles. I should be grateful for any comments, and even better editing, by yourself. As I said, they are only rough drafts that, at the very least, require signficant proof-reading before being done, but it seems like a good time to open out to a wider audience. Once these are done a number of the other patent law articles seem worthy of a significant rework to remove duplication. Kcordina ^Talk 12:31, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edits to patent application. Nice work!--Nowa 18:09, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aw, shucks, t'warn't nuthin'. Too wet t' plow ennyhow, but lupines are knee high. Lupinelawyer 12:18, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject NH Mountains

Consider joining WikiProject New Hampshire Mountains. You might be interested. More details are on the project page. -- Sturgeonman 18:12, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

View Tax

Hi there -- Thanks for finding the View tax article and providing lots of good background. Would you have a way of finding out if the first paragraph is even factual? My understanding was that Mel Thomson's son got the whole anti-"view tax" movement rolling last year, but I have never seen any reference to the NH Legislature passing "view tax" legislation, or towns starting to assess that way in 2003. It would be good if the article mentioned the anti-view tax movement, but I think it was originally written by an adherent of that movement who didn't really know what he/she was talking about. I appreciate the work you've put into this. Ken Gallager 15:07, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for noticing my small contributions. I do have references to a couple of NH court cases that have interpreted "view" as an essential element of a property assessment. There are some googled articles (of untested accuracy) reporting the "new" assessments with itemized view tax. Have not yet seen any "legislation", but might go search the online statehouse records, if I get a chance. A recent news article mentions bills sponsored by Reps. Stohl, Chase, Merrick, Kurk and Parkhurst. Lupinelawyer 18:16, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedian patent lawyers

Hello, Lupinelawyer --

I see that you're a patent attorney. I've recently created the category "Wikipedian patent lawyers." I'm inviting you to add this category to your user page. You can do this by adding [[Category:Wikipedian patent lawyers|Lupinelawyer]] to your user page.

You may also be interested in the categories "Wikipedian lawyers" and "Wikipedian intellectual property lawyers" as well.

Terry Carroll 18:13, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright and Public Domain Materials

Please see the talk page item on this subject for Public Domain if you can add anything to address the issues raised there. Mervyn Emrys (talk) 13:26, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Station nightclub fire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NFPA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rose kennedy.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rose kennedy.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:22, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Lupinelawyer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Lupinelawyer. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Lupinelawyer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2019 US Banknote Contest

US Banknote Contest

November-December 2019

There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons.

In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate.

If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]