Talk:Roseberry Topping

UK geography Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

British and Irish hills

This article is within the scope of WikiProject British and Irish hills, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the hills and mountains of Great Britain and Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British and Irish hillsWikipedia:WikiProject British and Irish hillsTemplate:WikiProject British and Irish hillsBritish and Irish hills articles

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Roseberry Topping is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Man-made?

Roseberry Topping is not man-made. The fall in 1911 was attributed by some at the time to the extensive mining operations but opinion now is that it was purely a natural occurance.

Mick Garratt, Great Ayton, North Yorkshire

Thanks, I've updated the article accordingly. -- ChrisO 22:45, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Although reference to jet mining on the lower south western? slopes of Roseberry Topping appear on early maps they do not appear on maps of the 20th century as opinion had it by then that jet mining did not in fact occur or Roseberry topping. See maps of the time in Middlesbrough Central Library Reference Section. Stuffed cat (talk) 17:16, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

National park

I am prety sure it IS in the national park. Samlaw (talk) 19:25, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it seems to be in the park. If you follow the OS grid reference then do OS get-a-map you can see the boundary running along the A173 at that point. It's especially clear on the 1:50,000 data where it's in yellow. Given that, I am going to remove the statement that it is not in the park, and would invite debate here and/or a reference if anyone wants to reinstate it.

Thanks DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered (talk) 16:45, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aireyholme Farm

Aireyholme Farm is really on the outskirts of Great Ayton, the farmhouse being about 1/2 mile SSW of the summit of Roseberry Topping. You could argue that the farm is on its southern slopes? This is clearly visible from Google Maps. The farm is not marked, but Aireyholme lane is, and the farm buildings are clearly visible from the satellite photo. There is a public footpath through the farm to Roseberry which I last walked about thirty years ago. Most people approach it from Newton-under-Roseberry or Gribdale, near Captain Cook's Monument Sasha (talk) 23:32, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shooting Box

The small building on the SW flank is not a "Shooting Box" in spite of the plaque erected by the National Trust. The building has been dated to the 18c and "shooting" did not become established as a country pursuit until the advent of the breech loading shotgun in the late 19c. Opinion is that the building is a prospect house built to enhance the landscape. A folly. Further discussed in Roseberry Topping published by the Great Ayton Archaeology Project in 2006 ISBN 0-9554153-0-6 pp 96-105

mjg

Oldest sandstone?

It may once have been but since the designation of the South Downs National Park it seems that the youngest sandstone in any national park in England and Wales is probably to be found there - see http://www.southdowns.gov.uk/looking-after/landscape/geology-of-the-south-downs cheers Geopersona (talk) 18:42, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Roseberry Topping/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.

Requires additional references adding using one of the {{Cite}} templates
Switch existing references to use one of the {{Cite}} templates
Distances need to be sorted out probably should all be imperial/metric as UK article

Keith D

Last edited at 13:36, 4 October 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 04:54, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

National Trust pilot

Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 10:51, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]