Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terman Middle School

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was no consensus to delete. Joyous 21:39, Jan 22, 2005 (UTC)

Terman Middle School

Doesn't appear notable, nor does it appear its creator was moving in that direction anyway. --InShaneee 03:27, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Yawn. Keep. School. —RaD Man (talk) 03:46, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Keep. It's bad article, but the school is worthy of inclusion. Khanartist 04:02, 2005 Jan 16 (UTC)
Another school to keep. --Centauri 06:06, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete. —Ben Brockert (42) 07:15, Jan 16, 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Samaritan 07:23, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Keep - David Gerard 14:12, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Keep.--JuntungWu 17:11, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete. The Palo Alto Unified School District deleted the school itself for twenty years, after the end of the baby boom. It has only recently returned to operation on its former premises, which has since become a Jewish Community Center. Not notable. --BM 02:04, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Keep. All schools are worthy of inclusion in a truly great encyclopaedia. Dr Zen 05:12, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete. No evidence of notability. Lacrimosus 09:48, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Merge into Palo Alto, California and delete - Skysmith 11:47, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Keep. All schools are inherently notable. --Andylkl 14:01, Jan 18, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Not notable- Wikipedia still has no policy on whether schools per se are notable or not, and this fails to establish it's notability. --G Rutter 14:32, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Keep. This article fails not to establish its notability. GRider\^talk 17:00, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Interesting info that's probably better served by merging into the Palo Alto article. This is a potential orphan as it stands. - Lucky 6.9 23:57, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Yawn. Delete. School. —Ben Brockert (42) 00:22, Jan 19, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Not inherently notable or encyclopedic. Article establishes neither. Gamaliel 16:12, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete. This is in no way notable or encyclopedic. Wikipedia is not a general knowledge base. Indrian 20:03, Jan 21, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. More schoolcruft. Edeans 21:32, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
keep this please. Yuckfoo 21:53, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.