Jump to content

Talk:Geodetic airframe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Airships

[edit]

Geodesic airships don't exist, this is merely a proposed construction method for airships of the future. The idea is worth consideration and may produce a cheap strong airframe which is easier to assemble than the "rings, ribs-and wire" type of dirigible construction seen in the early Zeppelins. No need to delete the topic. It is worthy of more talk.65.9.177.66 22:27, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Only the very earliest airships were not tapered. There exist today spherical airships that can navigate with high fuel consumption and low speed caused by their excessive air drag. I've never heard the term "geodesic" applied to tapered craft. Unless somebody wants to fix this, I'll propose that the article be deleted. Blimpguy 23:18, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Requested move 2012

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was Rename. Timrollpickering (talk) 12:06, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Geodesic airframeGeodetic airframe

Geodesy is a mathematical principle. Barnes Wallis termed his construction technique geodetic. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:19, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 13 July 2014

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move. Armbrust The Homunculus 07:01, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Geodetic airframeGeodesic airframe – first sentence in the lead mentions redirect first Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 10:53, 28 July 2014 (UTC) --Relisted. Armbrust The Homunculus 17:42, 20 July 2014 (UTC)  – Fgnievinski (talk) 02:37, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:25, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

From Speedy

[edit]

Survey

[edit]
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Discussion

[edit]
Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Geodesic or geodetic

[edit]

Doing some research on Barnes Wallis here. This article uses the words "geodesic" and "geodetic" interchangeably, is there any difference? Thanks 137.50.148.80 (talk) 21:25, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but WP disagrees and keeps getting it wrong. (Geodetic is right) Andy Dingley (talk) 22:02, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The confusion has arisen from the fact that there are not many instances in English of Greek nouns in -s forming adjectives with -t-. E.g., the adjective eidetic comes from the Greek noun εἶδος (eidos). The error of using the noun geodesic as an adjective was apparently commenced or popularised by Barnes Wallis but does not need to be perpetuated in Wikipedia. The English adjective formed from the noun geodesic is geodetic. Bjenks (talk) 02:36, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]