User talk:Smokris

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. I'm glad you've started contributing. Your edits look solid. As a new member of Wikipedia, you might like to start by reading the tutorial and introducing yourself at the new users page. Two useful tips are that you can sign your name using four tildes (~~~~) and you can practice editing by using the Sandbox. You can regularly find new tips on the Community Portal. I look forward to reading your great articles and I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. If you have any questions, you can ask at the help desk or on my talk page. :-) SWAdair | Talk 02:55, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Erie Plating Company

I saw your article on the "Erie Plating Company" and was hoping you might be able to fill in some blanks in the citations (as I am putting all the references into Citation templates to make it appear more uniform). The more information provided about a source makes it easier on someone else if they try to verify that source.

The title of the article in the Erie Business Magazine and author if it says.
"Minutes of The Sovern State of Pennsylvania v. Erie Plating Company"(could "Sovern" be a typo of "Sovereign"?)
The title and author of the article in the Finishers' Management magazine
The website from Gannon University doesn't mention anything about the Erie Plating Company
The title and author of the article in the Plating and Surface Finishing magazine
This website gives me a "Page has Expired" error

On a side note, I think I am going to nominate your article for inclusion in the Did You Know? section on the Main Page. I was thinking somewhere along the lines of...

Did you know...that the Erie Plating Company did the metal finishing for the 10,000 Olympic torches used in the 1996 Summer Olympic Games in Atlanta, Georgia? --Dtbohrer^{talk•contribs} 01:06, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback, Dtbohrer! Regarding #2, yes, this was a typo; I've corrected it. I'll do some more digging and try to find better/more complete references for the other issues you noted. -- smokris (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 18 DYK

On 18 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Erie Plating Company, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bedford ^Pray 01:22, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If DYK was updated before you had a chance to view it, the link to the version with your article is here. --D.B.^{talk•contribs} 11:57, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link in Erie Plating Company

The link http://members.eriepa.com/sbaweb/common/logreferral.asp?id=1022900&type=more is dead (expired, actually). I've tagged it as such. However, since this is a new article you've created, I'm guessing you can probably find it again? And please ensure that it is not something that expires; for instance, it appears to be a "members" website - perhaps you needed to log in in order to find it? If so, please at least provide a link to a page where non-members may find the article, even if they won't have full-text access. Thanks. Good article, by the way, congrats on getting it to DYK! -Lilac Soul ^{(talk • contribs • count)} ^{• I'm watching this page so just reply to me right here!} 06:13, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of −999

The article −999 has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer be able to have them marked as minor by default. For more information on what a minor edit is, see WP:MINOR or feel to get in touch.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:19, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]