Talk:Henrietta Lacks

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Henrietta Lacks article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

Henrietta Lacks has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 25, 2007	Peer review	Reviewed
February 26, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
May 13, 2009	Good article reassessment	Delisted
January 7, 2017	Good article nominee	Listed
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on October 4, 2017, October 4, 2021, October 4, 2023, and October 4, 2024.
Current status: Good article

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Medicine: Society Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Society and Medicine task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was selected on the Medicine portal as one of Wikipedia's best articles related to Medicine.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Illness Section?

Hey y'all, I'm skimming this article because I heard about it through friends. Is the entire Illness section just gone? I don't know anything about her outside of this article, so can someone who does please add at least something small in that section? Thanks much! Nathan Walsh (talk) 20:32, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Raccoonlad27 everything in § Diagnosis and treatment is part of § Illness --Jeremyb (talk) 20:43, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Resilience of the Cell Line

So skimming this article, one of the pieces that I didn't find was why the cells had more resilience? 38.75.212.85 (talk) 12:38, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Common sense departed!

"We could live forever like Henrietta Lacks cells"

... misses the point that the prevalence of these cells in your body will eventually kill you (or is it deliberate irony ... can't tell these days)? 2001:8003:70F5:2400:E11A:8A72:970:BF19 (talk) 00:47, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]