User talk:Wyatts

Goodbye, Wikipedia!

In case anybody wonders, I wanted to leave a note explaining why I left Wikipedia. First, I want to make clear that I didn't get mad or feel mistreated in any way. To the contrary, my experience with other editors has always been positive. I think Wikipedia is a great idea, and I tried to make some positive contributions with a few articles. Wikipedia has already achieved critical mass, and I this its success is assured. Although the Wikipedia community is great, I am the type of person who needs more structure in my activities. The total freedom to edit is a Wikipedia strength, but is not for me personnally.

I wish Wikipedia every success and look forward to seeing the one million article milestone soon.

--Wyatts 18:01, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Aww... We'll miss you. Send postcards. :-) — Omegatron 19:02, August 23, 2005 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Wyatts, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Flockmeal 23:03, Dec 5, 2004 (UTC)

Exponential distribution

I wonder if your new "applications" section should be merged with the earlier "occurrence" section? Michael Hardy 03:14, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Exponential applications

I viewed the "occurence" section as discussing some of its mathematical characteristics,e.g. modeling Poisson processes, and the example variables as interesting mathematical tidbits illustrating the flexibility of the exponential. I intended the "applications" section to show ways in which the exponential is actually used in the real world. Even though the "occurences" section lists "lifetime of an incandescent light bulb", which can certainly be viewed as a reliability application, this list doesn't quite get across what I was trying to convey. I agree, however, that these sections are somewhat related. Perhaps reordering the sections so that "occurences" naturally leads into "applications"? Or "applications" as a subsection of "occurences"? The exponential is used so extensively in reliability engineering that I thought it warranted a mention in this article. Wyatts 05:35, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Hook echo

Bet you didn't think Image:Tornado radar hook echo.gif was going to get used anywhere else. It now appears on 1999 Oklahoma tornado outbreak, and the newly-written and completely unverified by anyone but myself hook echo. See what you made me do!? -- Cyrius|✎ 04:15, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Tornado blanking

To deal with blanking and other forms of vandalism, see Wikipedia:How to revert a page to an earlier version. -- Cyrius|✎ 19:01, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Tagline proposal

Hi! Should we modify the official proposal to the shorter "... that anyone can edit. See disclaimer details"? -- Sitearm | Talk 21:39, 2005 August 5 (UTC)

That might be a good tagline. I'd give it a while (week or two) to see what else people come up with, and then pick the best one for the official proposal. I haven't noticed any vehement opposition so far, but that may change once we try to actually implement it. --Wyatts 21:53, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Per your lead, people are proposing specific wordings. I added a section to summarize proposed change versions. There was a 7 hour period on August 2nd when Omegatron did add "...that anyone can edit." to the actual tagline. But Blankfaze reverted it. Obviously, admins disagree too! -- Sitearm | Talk 22:36, 2005 August 5 (UTC)

Probably not so much a disagreement rather than the fact that the change wasn't discussed before it was made and it is so highly visible. We will have to build consensus among the Wikipedia community before making a change to the tag line. --Wyatts 01:38, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It was discussed on the village pump.
Ignore all rules.

It's not like it was a very controversial change, and I'm not revert warring it or anything. Just a little extra bold. ;-) - Omegatron 17:02, August 8, 2005 (UTC)

You said: There is much opposition to changing tagline. I think the opposition by Jimbo Wales to changing the tagline effectively kills the idea. As the founder of Wikipedia, his opinion carries exceptional weight (and he can probably make unilateral decisions if he really wants to.) I still want to do something to add a disclaimer statement at the top of every article, but I believe we will have to find a way to do it without modifying the tagline itself.

RESPONSE: I was concerned too. But the more I read Omegatron's comments, the more I think there is merit in capturing the back-and-forth in one place to lead to a likely eventual change.

If the text is to be displayed at the top of each page, that is the tagline in the current page template. I see no alternative unless we add another every-page-standard-line entity to the Wikipedia template design, which would be a major structural change. If the text is to be displayed anywhere else but the top, a fair reply is that it is already linked in the footer of every page so why bring up a change at all.

Are you proposing putting disclaimer text in the main body of every article? -- Sitearm | Talk 16:26, 2005 August 8 (UTC)

I'm proposing something like the original suggestion to put something at the top of every article, but not use the tagline, since there is strong opposition from Jimbo and others. I confess I don't know a good way to do this without using the tagline. Maybe (and I'm thinking out loud here) we could format it such that the disclaimer text is obviously separated from the tagline? e.g.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

All articles are user provided

in a collaborative effort.

--Wyatts 17:21, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RESPONSE: I've 1. Asked Omegatron's input on technicalities at User_talk:Omegatron#Tagline_alternative.3F, and 2. Added version with spacing on the project page. -- Sitearm | Talk 18:04, 2005 August 8 (UTC)

"All articles are user provided in a collaborative effort." is very dry-sounding. Surely we can do better. - Omegatron 18:23, August 8, 2005 (UTC)

RESPONSE: User_talk:Omegatron#Tagline_alternative.3F

I'm not an artist; just a critic. :-)
It should at least say "user-provided".
Hmmm... It sounds like an apology. "Where articles are collaboratively created by our users" sounds more optimistic, but kinda stupid. I'm not really sure... - Omegatron 01:00, August 9, 2005 (UTC)

Ok, "user-provided" is an option. Here also are terms from the article on collaborative writing:

coauthored
collaboratively authored
cooperatively written
group written
jointly authored
team written -- Sitearm | Talk 13:15, 2005 August 9 (UTC)

Has someone mentioned either of these two options yet? Somewhere where it will be obvious yet discrete.

My talk Preferences My watchlist My contributions Log out

My talk Preferences My watchlist My contributions Disclaimer Log out

Another alternative is:

Main Page
Community portal
Current events
Recent changes
Random article
Help
Disclaimer
Contact us
Donations

Either of these two options will be better than the way it is now. What is the big deal with the aesthetics anyway? David D. (Talk) 06:00, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RESPONSE: Response is here. -- Sitearm | Talk 16:16, 2005 August 10 (UTC)

Request for article citations supporting adding disclaimer more prominently

Contributers supporting adding the disclaimer more prominently on Wikipedia pages please cite articles and sign at Wikipedia:Proposed_update_of_MediaWiki:Tagline#Contributers_and_articles_that_support_adding_the_disclaimer_more_prominently. Thank you for your help! -- Sitearm | Talk 13:51, 2005 August 8 (UTC)

If no pages are cited, the case for change will be weakly founded. -- Sitearm | Talk 18:18, 2005 August 8 (UTC)

The proposal has been updated:

Leave current top-left text as is ("From WikiPedia the free encyclopedia.")
Add new top-right text ("All articles are user-contributed in a collaborative effort.")

Interested contributors please comment here. Thank you for your help! -- Sitearm | Talk 02:17, 2005 August 12 (UTC)

PD resources

I added a link to the PD page. That page could do with somework, cleaning up, integrating your input, if you're up for it. Pcb21| Pete 21:28, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your articles!

Defense standard, Failure rate, Reliability engineering are outstanding! -- Sitearm | Talk 17:07, 2005 August 13 (UTC)

Second tagline poll - please follow this link

(This is already announced on Pump and Rfc but I'm adding it here because I know you're interested.) -- Sitearm | Talk 04:49, 2005 August 16 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Who writes Wikipedia

What do you think of this page? Read the talk page to learn more about my plans... it's related to the conversation from a few weeks ago about changing the tagline. Mamawrites 09:21, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to see that you have left the project!

Just in case you come back... would you like to comment on this?

Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Proposal for a new navigation link

I hope that you are enjoying your WikiBreak, and you might consider coming back at some point! Mamawrites 11:25, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Star Trek Immunity Syndrome.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Star Trek Immunity Syndrome.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 09:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Worm gear.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Worm gear.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:14, 2 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:14, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Huntsville tornado damage 02.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Huntsville tornado damage 02.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:46, 3 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:46, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Huntsville tornado damage 03.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Huntsville tornado damage 03.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:46, 3 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:46, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:NOAA weather forecast.gif

Thank you for uploading File:NOAA weather forecast.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:47, 3 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:47, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Reliability sequential test plan.png

Thank you for uploading File:Reliability sequential test plan.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:57, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Technology readiness level

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Technology readiness level requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.army.mil/e2/c/downloads/404585.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Rathfelder (talk) 15:47, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Chinook helicopter in flight.jpg

The file File:Chinook helicopter in flight.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Limited source information from a dead site makes it difficult to determine licensing. Has been orphaned for almost three years. We have many other pictures of Chinooks in flight available.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ★ Bigr Tex 16:27, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Black Hawk helicopter in flight.jpg

The file File:Black Hawk helicopter in flight.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Limited source information from a dead site makes it difficult to determine licensing. Has been orphaned for almost three years. We have many other pictures of Black Hawks in flight available.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ★ Bigr Tex 16:28, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Kiowa helicopter in flight.jpg

The file File:Kiowa helicopter in flight.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Limited source information from a dead site makes it difficult to determine licensing. Has been orphaned for almost three years. We have many other pictures of Kiowas in flight available.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ★ Bigr Tex 16:29, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]