This user may have left Wikipedia. Talrias has not edited Wikipedia since April 2006. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Hi, welcome to my talk page! Please feel free to drop me comments about my contributions to Wikipedia. Critical messages are most appreciated.

Notes

If you are coming here because I left a message on your talk page, please reply there! I add people's talk pages to my watchlist after I leave a comment, so I will see any replies you make. I only remove the page from my watchlist a week or so after the discussion has ended.
I will reply to your comments on this page only, unless you request otherwise (so you may wish to add it to your own watchlist after adding your comments). I may leave a note on your talk page informing you I have replied.
Please remember to sign your comments.

Add a new comment!

Current messages

Oh noes! Please bring back your sanity!

Talrias, don't slip down that slope of sanity and fall into the much of troubled dendrites! --Durin 02:30, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talrias is already at the bottom of the sanity slope, surely? :P -- Joolz 03:57, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

True, he's a Kiwi afterall. --Durin 19:54, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Approvals group

Just wanted to let you know that I have removed references to the approvals group from both the main bots page and the approvals page. See Wikipedia Talk:Bots for my reasoning. Pegasus1138^{Talk | Contribs | Email} ---- 00:31, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya

Hi Chris - hope you're feeling better.

You might be interested to know that my son - Brookie Jr is off to Clifton in the autumn of 2007! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 17:04, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BAG election

There is a current election in progress for a new member of the Bot Approvals Group. The discussion is being held on WT:BAG. Thank you, — xaosflux ^Talk 23:36, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user has been inactive for just over a year. --Durin 01:41, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Mathematics Collaboration of the Week/current

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Mathematics Collaboration of the Week/current, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Wikipedia:Mathematics Collaboration of the Week/current fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:
Content moved a while ago, redirect no longer needed, only a handful of historical/obsolete pages link here
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Wikipedia:Mathematics Collaboration of the Week/current, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:37, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Project European Union

Hello Talrias, you are member of the project European Union. I try to create a new project page for the project. You can see it at here Because this should be the project page for all it´s members, please tell me, what you think about it. Please leave your comments on the talkpage of the project.--Thw1309 11:03, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Warcraft races

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Warcraft races, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Warcraft races is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Warcraft races, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 15:40, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Featured List of the Day Experiment

There have been a series of proposals to initiate a Featured List of the Day on the main page. Numerous proposals have been put forth. After the third one failed, I audited all WP:FL's in order to begin an experiment in my own user space that will hopefully get it going. Today, it commences at WP:LOTD. Afterwards I created my experimental page, a new proposal was set forth to do a featured list that is strikingly similar to my own which is to do a user page experimental featured list, but no format has been confirmed and mechanism set in place. I continue to be willing to do the experiment myself and with this posting it commences. Please submit any list that you would like to have considered for list of the day in the month of January 2008 by the end of this month to WP:LOTD and its subpages. You may submit multiple lists for consideration.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD) 15:36, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:UKCOTWC

A tag has been placed on Template:UKCOTWC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:49, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:British politics/party colours/Liberal Party

A tag has been placed on Template:British politics/party colours/Liberal Party requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:40, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain more fully...

Could you please explain why you moved mortar (artillery) to mortar (weapon)? Geo Swan (talk) 19:40, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom

List of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom has been nominated for a featured list removal. Lists are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the lst to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. -- SRE.K.A~~nnoyomous~~.L.24_[c] 01:53, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ashfield Independents

The article Ashfield Independents has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This isn't a political party, it is one or two independent councillors in Ashfield, and they aren't notable. I can't find any news coverage of them as a group, only a few passing references to one of their councillors, Roy Adkins (and he's not a notable person).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fences&Windows 01:09, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:UK general election results.png

Thanks for uploading File:UK general election results.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:52, 20 March 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 12:52, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:UK general election results.png

Thanks for uploading File:UK general election results.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 12:52, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Butting in here — facts are not copyrightable. My non-lawyer take on this is that you can probably ~~reproduce~~ recreate the chart without copyright problems, even if you can't use the exact file. --Trovatore (talk) 18:11, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, of course this analysis — for which I take no responsibility, in case anyone should get in copyright trouble — is based on my limited understanding of US law. That's mostly what matters here, given that the servers are in the US. But if you're in the UK, could things be different for you personally? No idea. --Trovatore (talk) 07:40, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Helpme

Template:Helpme has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 07:09, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suspension of admin privileges due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 22:22, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you would need to seek a new WP:RFA. Until December 30, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(delivered by mabdul 23:49, 3 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

An RfC that you may be interested in...

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cotw1

Template:Cotw1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Magioladitis (talk) 18:09, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TFL notification

Hi, Talrias. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for November 6. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 21:29, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just letting you know that the list has been pulled from TFL due to a dispute. Giants2008 (Talk) 15:47, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article has now been re-scheduled for December 18. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:22, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pro-Choice listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pro-Choice. Since you had some involvement with the Pro-Choice redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. f e minist 13:28, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Collab-eu

Template:Collab-eu has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:31, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Collab-uk

Template:Collab-uk has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:39, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Newcotw

Template:Newcotw has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:55, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Tirben-flag.png

The file File:Tirben-flag.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image. A proposed flag for a micronation of wikipedia editors which existed on IRC and a User subpage. WP:NOTWEBHOST

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ★ Bigr Tex 03:08, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merger of Template:Help me-helped

Template:Help me-helped has been nominated for merging with Template:Help me. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. interstatefive (talk) - just another roadgeek 01:37, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Talrias