Talk:Nickelodeon Movies

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2012; 2013; 2014; 2015; 2017; 2018; 2019; 2020; 2021;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

California: Los Angeles / Southern California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Southern California task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Television: Nickelodeon Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Nickelodeon task force (assessed as Top-importance).

This page is not a forum for general discussion about any rants, reviews, or any other forum like topics. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about any rants, reviews, or any other forum like topics at the Reference desk.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Bone (comics)#Film|Bone]] The anchor (#Film) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Films table

The table in the films table does not sort properly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elhenzo (talk • contribs) 18:52, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Don't remove the entire table then to make a point. Your edit has been reverted. Nate • (chatter) 23:51, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Table is a monster. It needs to be split. I'll attempt to do it soon.

From the example of other articles like List of Pixar films a separate table for Critical response seems like a good idea. -- 37.110.218.43 (talk) 10:29, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, adding 'more unneeded columns to the table certainly didn't help. Enough. We have articles about each film. Stop adding data atop data. Why do we even need a critical response section in the first place? These are kid's films, not the Criterion Collection. Nate • (chatter) 20:13, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The other IP removed columns from the big table and created another smaller table. Other animation studio articles list the Critical response for their films. If there is a general policy against these list and you were trying to removing them from more than just this article it would be somewhat understandable, but your deletes here seem arbitrary and inconsistent. Show another article like Sony Pictures Animation or Blue Sky Studios or List of Pixar films where you are removing the equivalent information, or making the articles more consistent.

As for them being "kids films" that's just intellectual snobbery, a good story is a good story. -- 109.76.148.130 (talk) 14:38, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't look at those articles, merely this one, because Nick articles have a history of taking on too much cruft. Frankly those studio articles should have the same de-crufting done if they're also loaded down with duplicative information. Readers come here to learn about the studio and the basics about the films. If they want to know more, the articles provide nice links to much more information which is more balanced than 'here's seven tables', and there's no snobbery involved, just trying to keep things straight and easy to read for anyone 2-82. It remains out. Nate • (chatter) 20:51, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't add anything, I only moved it out of the big table into a smaller table. I don't care if he deletes it, but I do agree he should try and get other articles to do the same thing, or get the film project or list project to help. Editors can look back at the old table which was way too big, and had too many colors, and look at the smaller table I split out. Maybe it will be useful later if someone wants to cleanup this article and create a separate ~~Cruft article~~ List article. -- 37.110.218.43 (talk) 11:38, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like The Film Article Section should have A Separate Article for themselves. Just like Dreamworks Animation and Dreamworks Pictures does anyone know how to make a separate article for That Section? Madpaak (talk) 01:15, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Madpaak please put back game shakers please Austinblakethompson (talk) 19:17, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Should we divide the Netflix/Paramount+ films into a separate section?

Hi. I have a proposal for a simple editing, but would like to discuss it before doing anything to make final confirmation. The proposal is, should the Netflix/Paramount+ films be divided into a new section as streaming movies, titled "Streaming films"? Since they are released on streaming, financial information is not likely to be recorded. If there's any objections, please message me back. Thank you. Animawiki29 (talk) 19:13, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No. It's just how it is. Akhil K. (talk) 04:06, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Nicktoons (film)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Nicktoons (film) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 20#Nicktoons (film) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay 💬 15:15, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Archives (Index)
2012 2013 2014 2015 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
This page is archived by ClueBot III.