User talk:Johnjosephbachir
Copyright for http://johnjosephbachir.org/content/wiseman.pdf
[edit]Have you licensed that file under a free licence? The file itself does not seem to have any copyright notice. Conscious 11:47, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Noble wine varieties
[edit]Merlot, Cabernet, Riesling and a few others are considered the Noble wine grape varieties. They are generally recognized as being the very best grapes for producing excellent quality wine. I assume that the author of the text you removed from the Barolo article meant to use Noble in this context. I didn't revert your edit because the original language was a bit stilted, but I thought you ought to know what the original author meant. Gregmg 21:43, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:62494 430742037182 580582182 5072620 5638233 n.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:62494 430742037182 580582182 5072620 5638233 n.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 07:43, 19 March 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. โผ 07:43, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
"Continuously differentiable" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Continuously differentiable. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 17#Continuously differentiable until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ๐๐ค๐ฏ๐บ๐ช๐ค๐๐๐ท๐ฎ๐ฅ๐๐บ๐ด๐๐๐ฐ (๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐ ) 21:21, 17 October 2020 (UTC)