Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sith code
Appearance
Non-encyclopedic fancruft. SWAdair | Talk 04:55, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Fancruft. Ian Pugh 05:44, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Yet more Star Wars cruft. Average Earthman 09:05, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Fancruft. jni 10:47, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- If the game is official merchandise, merge and redirect there. If not, delete - David Gerard 11:49, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Just a non-notable quote from a game. — Gwalla | Talk 19:35, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Notability not established. Fire Star 20:23, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Comment: Instead of jamming this into WP, fannish folk should really turn this type of stuff into a Wikibooks Speculative fiction annotated study guide. It may have a pop culture study use, but probably not in this forum.[[User:Davodd|DAVODD «TALK»]] 21:49, Oct 5, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. The fancruft is strong in this one. --Improv 16:13, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: Inconsequential gamer stuff. Geogre 20:54, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Although the above points are very valid, the 'Sith code' is still something that someone may want information about. 65.31.221.177 21:01, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- And they can find it on any fansite. Or GameFAQs, possibly. But why would you look for it on Wikipedia? Delete. --Aponar Kestrel (talk) 06:54, 2004 Oct 9 (UTC)
- Delete and then salt the earth so it can't reappear. I enjoy Wikipedia articles on fictional universes and strongly believe they should be kept. However, we really don't need a copy of the Sith fighting song. Gamaliel 21:07, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)