User talk:SkipperPilot
Welcome!
Additional tips:
- Here are some extra tips to help you get around Wikipedia:
- If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
- If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills, try the Sandbox.
- Click on the Edit button on a page, and look at how other editors did what they did.
- You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Always sign comments on Talk pages, never sign Articles.
- You might want to add yourself to the New User Log
- If your first language isn't English, try Wikipedia:Contributing to articles outside your native language
Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 18:40, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Tomahawk1.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Tomahawk1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Admrb♉ltz (T | C) 23:50, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- Drop me a line when you tag it. It is currently not used in any articles, but I would like to upload it to the Wikimedia Commons a repository for freely licensed images. --Admrb♉ltz (T | C) 23:50, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Another welcome message
[edit]I see you've been doing some work in the aircraft. You might want to consider checking out Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft if you haven't already done so. Cheers, Ingoolemo talk 23:20, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Beechcraft 1900 edit
[edit]Thank you, SkipperPilot, for your excellent edits of the Beechcraft 1900 piece. I submitted about 1/2 of the content, so I am interested in how it looks. Your cleanup looks very nice! Thanks again. Mikepurves 15:09, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Help (confession)
[edit]I did something stupid when trying to create a redirect at Champion Decathlon for the article on the Decathlon airplane which was produced by Champion Aircraft.
I created the page but made a syntax error, typing "redirect" instead of "#redirect." I tested the redirect and found my mistake, so I went back to repair it. But, when I tested the repair, it still didn't work, and now the problem was a big pink box. I admit that I didn’t read carefully what was in the big pink box; I assumed (wrongly) that it was there because of my syntax error. So, I removed the {{db-nonsense}} tag which was responsible for the big pink box.
Only after doing that did I look at the edit history and realize what had happened: My redirect had been sentenced to Wikideath as nonsense, either because of the forgotten "#" or because it’s lunacy to think that someone would look for Champion’s 8KCAB Decathlon by typing "Champion Decathlon." Anyway, when I looked more carefully at the big pink box, I noticed the emphatic warning: "[D]o not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself."
So, I messed up there. Even if I go back and revert my edit, I will still have violated the stricture, and I'm guessing that means it’s time for somebody to "release the dogs, or the bees, or the dogs with bees in their mouths and when they bark they shoot bees at you." I'm willing to go quietly. But, just for clarity (as distinct from punishment), is there any way to right my wrong? —SkipperPilot 00:03, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- Haha, I'll check quick and come back here to report. Equendil Talk 00:26, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- Alright, you've done absolutely nothing wrong, some other wikipedian was a bit overzealous and for whatever reason thought it was nonsense. Now, you were not supposed to remove the notice indeed, and bring it up to the talk page instead and let the admins dealing with deletions act accordingly. However, you choosed to (or we'll pretend you did) be bold and ignore all rules, nobody can fault that (of course, the story would be quite different had it truly been non sense). Equendil Talk 00:36, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
Aviation Newsletter delivery
[edit]The March 2007 issue of the Aviation WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 17:26, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi SkipperPilot - I've seen the great work you've done on other members of this family, and wondered if you'd care to take a look over this new addition? At the moment, the new article covers both the Sky-Trac and Challenger, but I wonder if it makes more sense to merge this with the Citabria article? Especially since the 7GCAA is already covered in the Citabria article, but I've included it in the Sky-Trac article as well, since my (admittedly limited) sources don't identify this model as a Citabria, and I don't know the lineage well enough to call it one way or another.
In fact, I wonder if you think it would make sense to merge both these articles together with the Champ and cover the whole "Model 7" family together? I'd be grateful for your insight here :) --Rlandmann (talk) 02:12, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Back?
[edit]Hey great to hear from you on Cessna 172! Glad to see that you are still active here on Wikipedia! - Ahunt (talk) 00:51, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Nice to hear from you! Yup time is always a limitation in working on Wikipedia. Lately I have found a bit of time and have embarked on a project that I thought needed doing - completing articles on all the Schweizer glider types. Okay I first learned to fly on them, so I have a soft spot for them! If you have any interest in the subject and the time to have a look, I would appreciate your fresh set of eyes and editorial input. None of them have had much attention so far, even though one got on DYK!
- Schweizer cargo glider designs
- Schweizer SGP 1-1 - Featured on "Did you know..."
- Schweizer SGU 1-2
- Schweizer SGU 1-6
- Schweizer SGU 1-7
- Schweizer SGS 2-8
- Schweizer SGS 2-12
- Schweizer SGU 1-19
- Schweizer SGS 1-21
- Schweizer SGU 2-22
- Schweizer SGS 1-23
- Ahunt (talk) 00:29, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Barnstar
[edit]The Citation Barnstar | ||
For great work correcting facts and supporting them with in-text citations on Homebuilt aircraft Ahunt (talk) 15:22, 1 June 2008 (UTC) |
An exciting opportunity to get involved!
[edit]As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis contribs 05:19, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
NowCommons: File:Champ 7AC-1759.jpg
[edit]File:Champ 7AC-1759.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Champ 7AC-1759.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Champ 7AC-1759.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:04, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)