Talk:Todd Gitlin

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

New York (state): Columbia University Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Columbia University (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

I don't agree that Gitln is more mecurial than Chomsky or Zinn. Gitlin publishes dozens of articles. What he seems to do is show he knows what is trendy, for example, people on the right seeking affirmative action by asking for a place on newspaper staffs, and then he carps at the trend. His article really don't say anythng much except to show he disapproves of conservatives and the media. His writing has no infuence at all. It won't change anything. I imagine he gave up trying to change anything a long time ago.

He certainly capitalized on being third president of the SDS in the 60s. He is a darling of liberals and leftists. People seem to question whether he really says anthing of value. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.12.209.105 (talk) 19:22, April 27, 2005 (UTC)

If you disagree with something that is written in an article, you can certainly change it yourself. —Sesel wa 22:40, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Maybe you should read some of his arguments of how the mass media had warped SDS' motive to understand his stance.

actually, watching Unreasonable Man, the Nader documentary shows how much he is not a liberal by certain standards, and he kind of comes across as a d-bag, if you will. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.136.6.20 (talk) 22:50, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Needs infobox

This page needs an infobox. I don't know enough about the person to make one. 80.44.254.158 (talk) 09:20, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Todd Gitlin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110202115731/http://thechosenpeoples.com/ to http://thechosenpeoples.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:44, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Todd Gitlin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:50, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]