User talk:Larryjhs
A tag has been placed on Steve Brook, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mhking 02:30, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Regarding that deleted article
[edit]When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.
Providing an edit summary might make it more likely that you will get a reply. Just be civil. Will (Talk - contribs) 07:57, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
I've restored this page and changed it from a speedy deletion candidate to a production deletion candidate, please see the tag on the page. If you feel the page meets the requirements you can remove that tag. I've notified the original nominator of the restoral, and they can still bring the page to our deletion discussion area if they feel that notabilty is not being asserted. Thank you, — xaosflux Talk 16:23, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Nice job at Emek Refaim - you really did some great (and well-needed) work there. If you can, try to format it so it conforms to the Wikipedia Manual of Style. I'll pitch in if I get a chance. Best, DLandTALK 05:02, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Kevin Andrews
[edit]Hi - your recent edit history discussion with CJ perhaps hinges on the destinction between a news article and an encyclopaedia. See Wikipedia:Recentism for some discussion of different approaches. Regards--Golden Wattle talk 21:46, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia Day Melbourne Meetup
[edit]Hi there. Just inviting you to the Melbourne meetup this Sunday at 11am, to celebrate our 11th anniversary. Details on that page. Hope to see you there! SteveBot (talk) 02:03, 11 January 2012 (UTC) (on behalf of Steven Zhang)
The Promise
[edit]Could I suggest that, in the interests of balance, you update your recent addition to The Promise page by citing the very positive mainstream press reaction to the programme, and/or quote from some of the positive web/blog activity around the serial? You are of course absolutely right to cite the very strong negative reaction to the programme in Australia from Jewish media and organisations but this has not been the only reaction and it is misleading to suggest it is. You will see that other parts of the article refer to both the positive and negative reaction to the programme in other countries. Peter Kosminsky (talk) 14:39, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
February Melbourne Meetup
[edit]Hi All. Just letting you know that we have another meetup planned for Melbourne, on Sunday, 26th February at 11am. More details can be found at the meetup page. Pizza will be provided. Look forward to seeing all of you there :-) SteveBot (talk) 23:09, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Comments on Structuration theory appreciated!
[edit]Hello! My name is MJ. I'm a new editor on Wikipedia. I have recently completed some large-scale edits to the structuration theory page. I saw that you've been active in providing significant content in the past, and I wanted to invite you to return and add your comments and suggestions about the page concerning its readability, clarity, usefulness, and/or comprehensiveness-- or anything you'd like to add! As I said, I'm a new editor on Wikipedia. The structuration theory page has been rated "Highly important" to the Sociology WikiProject, and I'm concerned with making sure that the page is both accurate and informative for readers who want to know more about this important sociological theory. More than anything, I've been inspired by the discussions that I've seen on Wikipedia and I'd like to inspire a similar discussion about the changes that have been made, improvements, or support on the talk page. I would love to see a resurgence in community interaction around structuration theory. Any suggestions you have are gladly received! I hope to see you on the talk page soon! Mjscheer (talk) 06:25, 22 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjscheer (talk • contribs)
Melbourne meetup
[edit]Hey all, just a reminder that there's a meetup tomorrow at 11am in North Melbourne. There are more details at the meetup page. Hope to see you tomorrow! SteveBot (talk) 04:42, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Meetup invitation: Melbourne 26
[edit] |
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Sunday (6 January). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 26. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 05:36, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Victoria)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Larryjhs. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Larryjhs. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)