User talk:Icd
Hi Icd, and welcome to Wikipedia.
Thankyou for finding the time to sign up and contribute to our little project. If you're in doubt about anything, you might want to check out some of these pages:
- Welcome, newcomers - a general introduction, and a good starting point
- The help centre and FAQs
- The Manual of Style - a guide to the community's writing conventions
It's also a good idea to sign the new user log and add a little about yourself.
When contributing to a talk page, you can sign your name by typing four tildes after your comments, like this: ~~~~. Some people do not pay attention to unsigned comments. An important note: Please do not add this signature to encyclopedia articles you may edit, even if you have created them. Wikipedia articles are owned by the community, not by any one person.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to me at my talk page, or at the Help desk or Village Pump.
But above all, make sure you be bold when contributing, and have fun!
TPK 06:23, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Hi Ian!
[edit]G'day Ian,
Nice to see you around on Wikipedia.
Best regards,
--pjf 23:17, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Noted your edit comment on the Falcon page. I'm curious as to where the rule comes from that "more horsepower" is incorrect, as opposed to "more power." I'm not sure I see the essential difference. RivGuySC 03:15, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I've answered this question on your talk page. Icd
Howdy, Icd. Or G'day.
I did think over your answer, but I'm not really convinced this is more than a style preference. For one thing, engine power is commonly measured in both horsepower and torque, so just saying more power is not precise. And I lean more to the rule that if fluent native speakers would readily say it and understand it, then it's correct enough, and I think "more horsepower" would certainly fall into that category. However, different strokes for different folks--or, to each his own. RivGuySC 03:55, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Be bold. You've given your reasoning, go ahead and do it. The worst that will happen is that someone will revert, and that's no crime. If they do, then check the talk page, then message them asking why they reverted. Be polite. Invite them to the talk page, and everything will be sweet. If it isn't, leave me a message and I'll try to assist.
Incidently, welcome to Wikipedia!
Your friendly neighbourhood Aussie administrator, Ta bu shi da yu 12:34, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
re: Stratocaster
[edit]The change was removing a list of 'famous Stratocaster players' that had been pasted into a paragraph where it didn't belong. If you want to include favorite Stratocaster players, please add them to the existing list at the bottom of the article. Auto movil 15:15, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Also, thanks for the mild smackdown on marking edits. You're right. See the note on my talk page. Auto movil 15:59, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Thanks! I appreciate your comment. It's something of a burden to monitor these articles I've mostly written (guitars, punk rock, food, etc.), and I do get it wrong sometimes, for which I apologize. Your edits were, I thought, not in the right place, but good edits. I'm sorry if I rankled. Auto movil 04:37, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Socialization
[edit]Ohhhhhhh, okayyyyyyy-- :-) Elf | Talk 06:38, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- I wonder what on earth this means? Icd 10:00, Jan 24, 2005 (UTC)
Referring to your comment on my talk page. Read as a long-suffering agreement to arm twisting but with a lighthearted smile. Or whatever. Elf | Talk 01:35, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Pentax
[edit]All I did was try to make sense of the previous statement "Asahi bought the name "Pentax" from the East German camera manufacturer VEB Zeiss Ikon, which probably derived it from PENtaprism and conTAX, because it also incorporated the use of a 42mm screw mount." I agree that my assumption that it meant the 42mm screw came with the name was just that, an assumption, but I couldn't see what else the writer might have meant. Since you queried it I looked on www.pentax.com which says "The Pentax name was created in 1957, derived from a combination of the words PENTAprism and refleX in recognition of Asahi Optical Co. Ltd being the first manufacturer to incorporate a pentaprism viewfinder and reflex mirror system into a camera." This brings into question whether they actually bought the name at all. A statement from http://www.cameraquest.com/pentorig.htm further clouds the issue "42mm thread mount which later became known as the Pentax or universal screw mount. It wasn't really the Pentax mount though, since the 42mm screw mount was introduced on the East German Contax S in 1949.", though the mention of Contax is reminiscent of the original. If you can find out any more I would not argue with subsequent changes, especially since I didn't make the original statement. --SMeeds 23:11, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for getting me out of that one. You're edit looks fine to me. I am more knowledgeable about the technical rather than the historical aspects, though some of what I know is now historical, if that makes sense. I agree it is clear that the 42mm mount is a side-issue. I realised after I wrote the above that the original writer probably meant that the name Pentax referred obliquely to the use of the 42mm thread, which had previously been used in a Contax. That didn't seem likely because it would amount to (admittedly covert) use of someone else's trade name. --SMeeds 22:49, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
I see that you are listed as a participant in the WikiProject Melbourne. If you are a Melbourne resident I would appreciate your views on the suggested Meetup in March . Please give some indication of your interest, or otherwise, in the idea. Even a simple "No thanks" with your user name would be welcome and assist in assessing the level of support for a meetup. Thank you.. Cuddy Wifter 06:30, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
Air Transat Flight 236
[edit]Thanks for the note, and sorry for the misunderstanding. I'd never heard that expression before in my life. I've now linked Air Transat Flight 236 to the Flameout stub. TheMadBaron 09:28, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Timeline of satellite...
[edit]I was still in the process of verifying facts for the note now added to that article. Rmhermen 05:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
ATMC
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article ATMC, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Powers T 23:20, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Internet in Australia
[edit]still interest in fixing internet in Australia?
I have made some changes but need help.
Digmores (talk) 01:26, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Masi Bicycles
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Masi Bicycles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Irbisgreif (talk) 06:50, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
- Hey Icd. Keep up the good work on Masi Bicycles. If you check the talk page, you will see I am getting really annoyed at how hard you are having to work just to make a nice article on a cycling company. It's just frustrating for me to see all the pushback on the kind of contributions that built Wikipedia, and made it as good and as comprehensive as it is today. Cheers from Canada, —fudoreaper (talk) 18:53, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi, At last month's June meetup we discussed the idea of setting up a Training Course at a University of the Third Age (U3A) to be held in 2013 and named Becoming a Wikipedia editor. In order to get this course up and running we are calling for volunteers to help develop the idea, and either tutor part of the course, or provide one on one help to students in the class. All local Wikipedians are welcome to discuss this at our 11am meetup to be held this Sunday on 22 July. Please add your name to the attending list at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 23. Food and beverages are provided. Cuddy Wifter (talk) 04:09, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 14
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Triumph Daytona 675, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Power (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Icd. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Icd. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
The article AS 2805 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:29, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Go ahead, I am totally fine with soft deletion (i.e. copy the content to your proposed target and redirect the article there). Tnx! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:05, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Icd. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Merger discussion for DMZ_(computing)
[edit]
An article that you have been involved in editing—DMZ_(computing)—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Stephen Charles Thompson (talk) 19:49, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Icd. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The article AS 2805 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AS3959, notability not established with substantive independent sources
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 02:05, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AS 2805 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.