Jump to content

Talk:Silvia Saint

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Breasts

[edit]

Who wrote, her breasts were natural? They don't look natural at all. Does anybody know more about this?--Martinxxxx72 (talk) 14:36, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

She has implants. There is a notable difference in the shape and size of her boobs from nude images circa 1996 and 2000. Vinh1313 (talk) 17:17, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bravo to all you discerning breast lovers. While her breasts were nearly perfect, but small, in earlier photos, Silvia choose the way of most adult entertainers, and enhanced her breasts. They are very good fakes...this is accomplished by selecting an appropriate implant, and inserting them under the muscle. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.45.219.126 (talk) 15:13, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Several issues

[edit]

So, first of all, I think "Silvia" is the proper spelling. Or that's what Google says.

"Silvia" is the proper spelling. This is supported by the title of her official website, Club Silvia Saint. I'll move it after I'm done making my edits to it. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. 23:40, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Actually, couldn't move it myself as Silvia Saint is a redirect to "Sylvia Saint" article. I requested that it be moved. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. 00:22, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Second, who called Ms. Saint "Anal Sex Queen"? Any sources? That should be taken out.

Third, I don't think it's legal to publish pictures of a public figure endorsing a product or company without their permission. -- ESP 22:25 20 Jul 2003 (UTC)

I'm not sure about Ms. Saint's permission, but I'm pretty sure . on the other hand I believe there are so many people in Arab world love this woman , the last web traffic statistics show that 90% of ordering Sylvia saint pic & movies are coming from UAE , and 89% of 90% is coming specifically from city called sharjah. Bomis won't object: it's majority owned by a certain Jimbo Wales. Now can we get her to pose in a Wikipedia T-shirt? Jpatokal 15:31, 23 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Jimbo knows about the photo, and commented about it somewhere (I can't remember where). I believe he said "Well, I didn't give permission, but I don't have a problem with it", or something to that effect. -- Middenface 22:18, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Husband

[edit]

She is married to a Czech tycoon, not Mr. Marcus.

Can we have a source or three on this, please? -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. 00:22, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This is correct. Silvia was NEVER married to Mr. Marcus. They had a purely sexual relationship. This very brief relationship ended in 2000. Source is from Marcus and Silvia Saint's Management team directly, this is published for public viewing on Luke is Back in this article (I'll make the changes to the main article) JordanGekko (talk) 19:26, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Will the real Anal Sex Queen please stand up

[edit]

Googling for "the anal sex queen" (the "the" is needed to filter out huge amounts of spam) one finds Tristan Taormino to be the person most commonly described thus. Following are Sylvia Saint, Kendra Jade, Sahara Sands, and Bridgette Kerkove. Thus we can conclude that SS is "an anal sex queen", but not really "the anal sex queen". -- Middenface 22:18, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A search for "anal sex queen" and "sylvia saint" (in quotes so that the words are searched for as a phrase) yields around 30 hits. Non-notable.--Nectarflowed (talk) 22:45, 10 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Things to be found out

[edit]
  • The biography seems like it needs more meat to it. Official sources would be nice.
  • We also need to substantiate if the pregnancy news item and find out whether or not she was married, and who was the fortunate indvidual?

-- Joe Beaudoin Jr. 00:22, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Appearance on TripleJ

[edit]

Ah, the highs and lows of Wikipedia. On July 29 2005 Silvia Saint appeared on the Australian Radio Station Triple J's Today Today program. She was in Australia for the Sydney Sexpo and was interviewed and apparently answered callers questions about sexual and emotional problems. [1] (There may be a link to an MP3 on the website referenced of the interview to confirm facts.)

From Victor (CSS Forum) - The Slovak lady photographer's name is WANDA POLAK and her former husband is Martin Bucek, who presently co-owns ClubSilviaSaint.net. Martin's present partner is glamour model Evelyn Lory. Wanda and Martin did a great job when Silvia was making her modelling comeback in late 2002.
Silvia told me in London in July 2004 that she was not in fact married. I do not believe Silvia has any children.
You could contact Martin directly for some more information but I cannot say how much information Silvia would want to release. info@softcoreillusions.com
I prepared a List of Silvia's Movies (it needs a little updating) but there's over 430 titles identified to date. You can locate this on the Pay Site (in the free of charge section) The Pay Site is at: http://www.clubsilviasaint.net/. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.189.231.45 (talk • contribs) at 20:17, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Zero gee sex scene?

[edit]

I've heard somewhere that Silvia Saint was in some sort of zero gee sex scene filmed in one of those planes that flies in parabolic arcs. Is this true? If so, it would make her one of a very small number to have ever done something like that and should probably be mentioned in her bio. --Cyde 01:56, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It was in the movie the uranus experiment. I dont know if its real or FX. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.59.188.14 (talk • contribs) at 17:17, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Gee! Just for the record: Zero G --82.141.49.217 06:20, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Private Media Group filmed a brief scene for the space-themed pornographic film The Uranus Experiment in a Russian aircraft flying a parabolic track (similar to NASA's Vomit Comet). The Uranus Experiment features around 20 seconds of pornography actors Sylvia Saint and Nick Lang (who portray astronauts living on a space station) having sex in freefall. The scene was nominated for a Nebula Award in 2000, but did not win. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.30.145.238 (talk) 00:25, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

She left the porn?

[edit]

So how is her web-site updating? She seems to not be filming sex scenes anymore, but does pose in softcore pictures. That's my impression anyway. I don't know enough to put it on the main page. -- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.91.170.100 (talk) 18:37, May 22, 2007

She's returned to the business and is actively promoting and updating her journal and you are right it doesn't look like she's shooting much anymore but has returned on a full-time basis and attends shows to promote her older films (read it on her myspace), wish she'd do some new stuff also but I don't think she really needs to from a personal standpoint given she has her brand already developed. JordanGekko (talk) 00:23, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Text needing work

[edit]

The following text needs work as it is clearly riddled with POV issues:

She is considered one of the most recognisable and famous faces in porn. She differs from many other porn "A-listers" in the versatility of her roles; which have included interracial, lesbian, and even foot fetish themes.

-- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 00:45, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External Links.

[edit]

In short, official sites are meant to be there. Full stop. Mathmo Talk 01:10, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Secondly, don't label edits as vandalism when they are clearly not. Regarding vandal calling I suggest reading no personal attacks. A moresources tag shouldn't be used when an article already has many sources, because such a tag is far too vague to of much use. Rather it is better to put fact tags wherever you feel there is a problem. Mathmo Talk 01:12, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heterosexual my ass!

[edit]

I can't begin to understand why she's listed as such. She loves girls, as she's proven countless times, and I love her for it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RedVengeanceIII (talk • contribs) 20:20:58, August 19, 2007 (UTC).

Because if you read through the reference, you'll see why she's listed as heterosexual. From the cited interview when asked if she was bisexual: "No, I'm 100% hetero. But I don't object against having sex with other women." Seems clear enough. Tabercil 03:21, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would you guys let another guy prove you in the ass with his dick and still regard yourselves as heterosexual? She's licked, fingered and fucked more pussy than Ron Jeremy has. I rest my case! 01:34, 20 December 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.234.109.196 (talk)

Well, I think she describes herself as hetero because she only makes lesbianism scenes in front of cameras. She doesn't have sex with other women behind the scenes... I think. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.37.81.53 (talk) 18:39, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On an interview she says she prefers have sex with women. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.21.76.13 (talk) 09:01, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Again as stated before earlier on discussions, vandalism is not tolerated. It appears there is a user with the IP of 66.152.79.250 vandalizing a number of pages on here, including this one with previous edits to webcam sites. There is no reason that we should have two links to the same site especially when it is already stated in the main information box. We also do not need other links that are non-relevant to the subject topic. 66.152.79.250, please be aware that editors who persist in such misbehavior are quickly banned from Wikipedia. Thanks. JordanGekko (talk) 11:33, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I almost feel the need to write an independent article regarding the proper identification of linkspam. I've been watching this and a number of articles for the past few years and despite the best efforts to properly identify linkspam and vandalism, there always seems to be confusion of the issue. People, identifying linkspam requires more then a glance, it is very clear when it is obvious BUT when you are dealing with sites that have been involved in Cybersquatting cases, you do need to look deeper especially since the proper links have been involved in lawsuits over intellectual rights and domain names.

Sylvia Saint won her case in 2006. As Mathmo stated, official sites are meant to be there, these sites have been in litigation and have been in lawsuits that were won by the individuals, these are NOT secondary producer sites, labeled as "official sites". Further clarification - in some cases, individuals will assign a secondary producer to manage and operate their "official sites" and that is fine. This is not the case when it comes to a name has been copyright and a Cybersquat was awarded.

Please, before editing articles especially that have been involved in cases as mentioned before, review certain items about the site before labeling it as linkspam. The key factors are a) where the site is hosted b) the DNS name c) the copyright information and finally the most identifying feature of the website ownership, the 18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement also called the 2257. This is taken from the 2257 directly at http://silviasaintfilms.com/2257.htm, "SILVIA SAINT AND SILVIA SAINT FILMS are registered trademarks of Silvia Saint Entertainment, managed and operated by Net Fame Solutions Inc." Official sites are meant to be here, do not list non-official sites. This is a legal issue given the history of the names and individuals involved. JordanGekko (talk) 06:12, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Piano non troppo removed the link to clubsilviasaint.net and commented, that this is a link to a social site. I reinserted it because actually this is one of her official websites (the only one she owned already before the WIPO case, it's even cited in [2]). Valrith reverted me again with a no-comment. Ironically it was just Valrith who had inserted this link the last time on Jan 22, after he had reverted the addition of the other official site silviasaintfilms.com several times.

In general I respect the fight against linkspam, but here it's her website since 5 years, including her blog and her new exclusive productions. I don't see how anybody could doubt that this site is official.--Tantamo (talk) 07:51, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Penthouse Pet is an award?

[edit]

I don't think Penthouse Pet of the Month/Pet of the Year should be listed as "awards". I just looked over about a dozen other articles on Penthouse Pets and none of them listed these in that fashion.

Opinions? Valrith (talk) 20:18, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Silvia Saint. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:44, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Silvia Saint. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:41, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Silvia_Saint&oldid=1205239668"