Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Template:CompactTOC
On 1 August 2004, Template:CompactTOC was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KEEP. Rossami 04:48, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC) A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Ugly and inconsistent. Should be replaced with Template:CompactTOC2 (that is, {{CompactTOC2}} should become {{CompactTOC}}). - Eequor
| Table of contents: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z |
- Not a vote yet: wouldn't it make more sense to edit Template:CompactTOC rather than delete it and change all the references throughout Wikipedia to CompactTOC2? Bryan 17:23, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, CompactTOC is protected. --Eequor 17:35, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. CompactTOC is protected as part of the standard policy of protecting frequently used templates to minimize massive vandalism. If you want to propose a change to the template, propose it on the talk page of CompactTOC - if consensus exists to make the change, a sysop can make the change for you. A VfD, however, is not the appropriate method of trying to change this.Snowspinner 17:51, Aug 1, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Fix as per proper procedure if you think it needs repairing - David Gerard 17:55, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Keep as is. It's more compact than the non standard aligned compactTOC2. -- User:Docu
- Would left-justification improve CompactTOC2? In my opinion, it looks better as it is. --Eequor 18:43, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.