Talk:Cryptocoryne

Fischer?

From the article:

The genus was described by Fischer in 1828.

Who is "Fischer"? Neilc 04:54, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)

 The scientist who scientifically desribed the taxon.
 In botanical nomenclature, name of the person who described
 the taxon is important part of the taxon's name. For example
 the full name of the first species is written as
 C. spiralis (Retzius) Wydler - Retzius being in () because
 he described it in a wrong genus. It was reclassified by Wydler
 after Fischer described the genus Cryprocoryne Fischer ;) --Kyknos 10:27, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

taxonomy

the taxonomy of the Crypts is complicated and in dispute. Where possible I have followed the suggestions of Jacobsen and the Crypts pages site by Jan D. Bastmeijer [1] rather than Rataj's, mainly because I am more familiar with it, and generally it seems to be more accepted amongst Crypt enthusiasts. Hermeswiki 17:31, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

citation

I have added a citation to a reference for the taxonomy of this plant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Driletown (talk • contribs) 20:02, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cryptocoryne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:35, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable species listed

Hello, the following taxa are mentioned under the species, however I could not find anything in the literature surrounding these species, only a few youtube videos showing the supposed species. Furthermore, all of the other species listed in this article can be found in the Kew World Checklist of Selected Plant Families listed in the reference section, so I'm not sure where these species are coming from. It is also curious that all these species are prescribed to the same author. All the aforementioned youtube videos are all on one account as well... potential WP:CONFLICT issue?

Cryptocoryne kobayashii Yosuke Kobayashi. - West Kalimantan, Indonesia

Cryptocoryne renifolius Yosuke Kobayashi. - West Kalimantan, Indonesia

Cryptocoryne ochiaii Yosuke Kobayashi - Peninsular Malaysia

Cryptocoryne nurii var. tamannegaraensis Yosuke Kobayashi - Peninsular Malaysia

Cryptocoryne huluensis Yosuke Kobayashi - West Kalimantan

Cryptocoryne diabolicus Yosuke Kobayashi. - West Kalimantan, Indonesia

Cryptocoryne crispatula var. alba Yosuke Kobayashi. - Thai, Laos

Cryptocoryne cordata var. natunensis Yosuke Kobayashi. - Natuna Island

Cryptocoryne cordata var. brunneus Yosuke Kobayashi. - Central Kalimantan, South Kalimantan

I'll leave this list here incase someone can provide more information as to their validity, in which case they should be returned to the article, but until then I have removed them from the list. Ekmek the fig (talk) 00:14, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]